Results Summary And Analysis
US Midterms 2018: Democrats take the House and Republicans keep the Senate | #GME
The Democratic Party won control of the House of Representatives in the 2018 midterm elections. The Democrats gained a net total of 41 seats from the total number of seats they had won in the 2016 elections. This was their largest gain of House seats in an election since the 1974 elections, when the Democrats gained 49 House seats. Democrats won the popular vote by more than 9.7 million votes or 8.6%, the largest midterm margin for any party and the largest margin on record for a minority party. According to the Associated Press statistical analysis, gerrymandering cost the Democrats an additional sixteen House seats from Republicans. Voter turnout in this election was 50.3%, the highest turnout in a U.S. midterm election since 1914. Note that the results summary does not include blank and over/under votes which were included in the official results or votes cast in the voided election in North Carolinas 9th congressional district. âRepublicans Hold On To Senate Majority With Upset VictoriesRepublicans retained their majority in the Senate on Tuesday after a string of upset victories in key states and gave the GOP sweeping powers to advance President-elect Donald Trumps agenda, including his appointments to the Supreme Court. With a GOP House majority also secure, Republicans now have full control of the White House and Congress after an election season that began with their party facing long odds because of the large number of Senate seats they had to defend. Republicans entered Election Day expecting to fight head winds in several states because of Trumps controversial candidacy. But Trump overwhelmed Democrat Hillary Clinton in several critical states, giving the GOP an unexpected margin of victory. Trump provided coattails that gave the GOP a major win that could allow him an easier path toward confirming Supreme Court justices and Cabinet nominees, as well as fashioning long-sought legislation to overturn signature achievements of the Obama administration, particularly the Affordable Care Act. Republicans defended their Senate seats in Florida, Indiana, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, states that once looked like some of their toughest terrain. Democrats picked up a seat in Illinois, where Rep. Tammy Duckworth unseated Sen. Mark Kirk. According to one estimate, New Hampshire wasnt far behind, with about $125;million spent there in a state where only about 800,000 were expected to vote. Speaker Of The House Of RepresentativesThe position of Speaker is constitutionally specified in Article 1, Section 2. The Speaker is the only party leader who is chosen by a roll-call vote of the full House of Representatives, which occurs after each party has nominated a candidate for the position when a new Congress convenes. House rules give the Speaker various formal duties. These include, for example, administering the oath of office to new Members, signing House-passed bills and resolutions, presiding over the House , referring measures to committees, and naming the party’s slate of members for certain committee positions. Each party conference cedes additional powers and responsibilities to a Speaker from its own party, including influence over the makeup of certain standing committees. For more information, consult CRS Report 97-780, The Speaker of the House: House Officer, Party Leader, and Representative, by Valerie Heitshusen, and CRS Report RL30857, Speakers of the House: Elections, 1913-2019, by Valerie Heitshusen. Table 1. Speakers of the House of Representatives, 1789-2019
See the “” section at the end of this report for a description and full citation of all sources. Notes:A key to all party abbreviations can be found in the Appendix of this report. b. Resigned from the House of Representatives, January 19, 1814. c. Resigned the speakership on October 28, 1820. d. Resigned from the House, March 6, 1825. e. Resigned from the House, June 2, 1834. i. Died in office, August 19, 1876. Recommended Reading: Is Red The Color Of Republicans Who Ended Up With Majority Control Of The Us SenateAll eyes were on which party would control the U.S. Senate in 2015. The Democratic-controlled Senate in the 113th Congress had a partisan breakdown of 53-45-2, with the two Independents caucusing with the Democrats. For Republicans to take the majority in the Senate, they needed to take at least six of the 36 seats up for election that were held by Democrats, and retain control of the 15 seats held by Republicans. The section updated the seat count for each party throughout the night and the vote totals in the hotly contested races. “*” indicates that the incumbent retired in 2014.
States That Lost SeatsCalifornia continues to be the most populous state in the country, but its pace of growth has slowed enough that it will lose a seat in the next Congress. That means the states independent redistricting commission will have to decide what part of the state loses representation, which could hurt one party. Based on population growth, the endangered seat could very well be a district located completely or partly in Los Angeles County. And because Democrats control almost all of those seats, that could mean they will suffer a net loss from Californias redistricting. However, the removal of a district could make Republican Rep. Mike Garcias seat in northern Los Angeles County even more Democratic-leaning than it already is Biden carried it by 10 points if the districts new lines stretch further southward, which would give Democrats a better chance of capturing that seat. Lastly, we know for sure that Republicans will be the ones to lose a seat in West Virginia. All three current members of Congress from the Mountain State belong to the GOP, so at least one out of Reps. David McKinley, Alex Mooney or Carol Miller will not be in the next Congress. Expect a lot of intrigue surrounding how, exactly, the seat is redrawn and perhaps a rare incumbent-vs.-incumbent primary election. You May Like: Did Trump Say That Republicans Are The Dumbest Group Of Voters Also Check: Why Do Republicans Hate Planned Parenthood A Statewide Primary And The 1986 Election
In 1972, the state party made a historic change from a state convention nominating system for all candidates to having a statewide party primary. This allowed voters to directly choose all nominees for public and party offices with its main goal being to broaden public support for the party. It would only slowly have that desired effect. In 1978, the party would begin its long steady build-up to competing for seats in the legislature by winning a few seats in suburban Birmingham, Mobile, and Montgomery. In 1980, Jeremiah Denton became the first popularly elected Republican U. S. Senator in Alabama history after first winning that new statewide primary. Biden Administration: Heres Who Has Been Named So FarReturn of the bipartisan gangs After months of stalemate over the size and scope of a coronavirus relief package in the closing weeks of the last Congress, a group of centrists from both parties, led by Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, unveiled a $900 billion compromise plan that became the basis for the legislation that ultimately was approved by the House and Senate and signed by President Trump. Manchin has said he hopes that model can translate into efforts in 2021. Other Republican moderates such as Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska who helped on the COVID-19 aid package could also serve as powerful players if they decide to work across the aisle. Progressives push for Senate rule changes Liberal Democrats have pressed to get rid of the legislative filibuster so that they can pass major health care or environmental bills with a simple majority. Biden has sidestepped questions about whether he supports doing away with keeping the 60-vote threshold, but several top Senate Democrats have signaled they back changing a rule that many of them once insisted was essential to the institution. There will be intense pressure on Biden and Democratic leaders to show they can pass some bills with GOP support, but if Senate Republicans stay largely unified to thwart the new administrations agenda, calls to eliminate the filibuster will increase. You May Like: What Is Trump Democrat Or Republican United States Senate Elections 2022
Elections to the U.S. Senate will be held on , and 34 of the 100 seats are up for regular election. Special elections may be held to fill vacancies that occur in the 117th Congress. Those elected to the U.S. Senate in the 34 regular elections in 2022 will begin their six-year terms on January 3, 2023. Fourteen seats held by Democrats and 20 seats held by Republicans are up for election in 2022. Republicans are defending two Senate seats in states Joe Biden won in the 2020 presidential election: Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Democrats are not defending any Senate seats in states Donald Trump won in 2020. Following the 2020 Senate elections and the January 2021 runoffs in Georgia, Democrats and Republicans split the chamber 50-50. This gave Vice President Kamala Harris a tie-breaking vote, and Democrats control of the U.S. Senate via a power-sharing agreement. Thirty-two of the 34 seats up for election in 2022 were last up for election in 2016. Georgia and Arizona have seats up for election in 2022 that were up for special election in 2020. States With Obamacare Lawsuits
Democrats take House, Republicans keep Senate in historic midterms
Attorneys general in 27 states filed lawsuits in 2010 and 2011 challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Two-thirds of those attorney general seats were up for election in 2014. The following table tracks partisan control over these attorney general offices before and after the 2014 election. Note:Catherine Cortez Masto refused to file a lawsuit against the federal government in 2010, leading then-Gov. Jim Gibbons to appoint attorney to sue the government on the state’s behalf.
Voters weighed in on some of the nation’s most contentious topics during the 2014 elections, making this election cycle one of the most significant in recent history. Decisions made at the ballot box established important precedents and set the tone for future elections. Below are the statewide measures Ballotpedia identified as the most important, high-profile and divisive of 2014. These measures were selected based on the issues addressed, the amount of money spent on them, the volume of media attention focused on each, and the likelihood that the outcomes of these measures would affect future ballot measure elections. The chart below was updated as results came in. Topics on the ballot:
Read Also: When Did Democrats And Republicans Switch The Impact Of The Filibuster On Federal Policymaking
The Impact Of The Filibuster On Legislative OutcomesIt is easy to demonstrate that the filibuster has increased in use and that it allows a small minority to frustrate the will of the majority. It is not easy, however, to quantify the actual impact of the filibuster. To provide a sense of the filibusters impact, this report first examines significant bills that were blocked by filibusters. Second, it provides examples of legislation that never made it to a vote in the first place because senators assumed these bills would be blocked by the filibuster. The list of bills is intended to capture significant policy changes that would have gone into effect if not for the filibuster. It is composed of bills considered since the beginning of the Clinton administration that: 1) had the support of a majority of senators; 2) were subject to a filibuster but lacked the 60 votes to overcome it; and 3) would likely have become law if passed by the Senate. Note that, in some cases, filibustered bills were eventually passed but with substantial concessions to the senators blocking the original bill. Bills that the Senate filibuster blocked108th Congress : Bush administration, Republican trifecta109th : Bush administration, Republican trifecta115th : Trump administration, Republican trifecta
103rd Congress : Clinton administration, Democratic trifectaClimate changePublic option for healthcareRead Also: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Y Control In Congress And State LegislaturesIn the politics of education course I teach this semester, I was looking for a nice overview of trends in party control for Congress and state legislatures. Just a simple chart showing trends in which party holds the majority in the House and Senate and whether similar trends occur in state legislatures. We often just focus on one or the other, but I want to see Congress and states on the same graph. But I couldnt quite find what I was looking for. So in its absence , I compiled data from the Senate and House history pages along with the National Conference of State Legislatures partisan composition page. A few notes about whats being measured here. For the states, NCSL tells us whether both chambers are controlled by a given party. If Democrats hold both chambers, then the state is coded as Democrat. States are coded as Split if Democrats carry one chamber and Republicans the other. Nebraska is omitted because it has a non-partisan unicameral legislature, but I put them in the Split plus NE category just so we have all 50 states. And all data are as of January of the given year, except 2016, which uses December to reflect the outcomes of the most recent election: Shifting gears to Congress, the chart shows the percentage of members from each of the two parties: But these three charts are hard to put the full picture together, so the following combines them into a single visualization that I think tells the story a little clearer: Data: Ten Democratic Senators Vote With Republicans For Keystone Xl PipelineTen Democratic senators have voted with Republicans to allow the progress of a bill to extend the Keystone oil pipeline, placing more political pressure on the White House to reconsider its proposed veto of the legislation. The procedural motion was passed by 63 votes to 32, comfortably clearing the three-fifths majority needed to avoid a filibuster and falling just short of the two-thirds majority that would be needed to overcome a presidential veto when it comes to a final vote. But some of the Democrats, who were also joined by Maine independent Angus King, may switch votes in future to avoid embarrassing Barack Obama who has said he is opposed to Congress interfering in a long-running administration review of the pipeline extension. Keystone has become a symbolic battlefield for the administrations climate change policy, with critics insisting that it will encourage the exploitation of heavily-polluting Canadian tar sands and supporters claiming it will create thousands of jobs. The bill will now see various amendments added over the coming weeks, a process which could ultimately decide on its level of support among Democrats. It was approved by the House of Representatives last week by 266-152 votes, a margin also short of the two-thirds majority in both chambers needed to overcome White House opposition. Also Check: Secret Service Lapel Pin Meaning How Many Democrats How Many RepublicansI want to follow up on my last post regarding how variations in poll results are often due to differences in how pollsters construct their samples. The previous post talked primarily about whether pollsters were sampling likely or registered voters. Obama, I suggested, polled better among registered voters. ;Today I want to look at another decision pollsters must make: whether to weight their sample by party identification and, if so, what weights to use. We know that whether one considers oneself a Democrat or a Republican is the biggest single determinant of how someone will vote. Not surprisingly, people tend to vote for the candidate who shares their party identification. So a poll that includes 40% Democrats in its sample is likely to have more favorable results for Obama than one that includes 35% Democrats, all other things being equal. Ditto for McCain and variations in the number of Republicans sampled. To see how this makes a difference, consider two ;respected national polls that came out yesterday. CBS/NY Times came out with their monthly national poll that has Obama up 49-44, with 6 undecided. Rasmussen, meanwhile, has the race tied, 48-48% in its latest tracking poll. I show you these numbers to give you an idea of what it means to weight by party.; But why does it matter? Compare the CBS weighting to what Rasmussen calculates when they weight by party. Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/how-many-democrats-and-republicans-are-in-the-senate-2015/
0 Comments
Federal Bureau Of Investigation
GOP lawmakers call for second special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch
The FBI opened its investigation soon after the attack and it remains ongoing. On May 2, 2013, the FBI released photos of three men from the Benghazi attack site, asking for help from the public in identifying the individuals. On June 16, 2014, in a joint effort by U.S. Special Operations and the FBI near Benghazi, Libya, an alleged ringleader of the Benghazi attack, Ahmed Abu Khattala, was apprehended. He was removed to a U.S. warship in the Mediterranean and was later to be transported to the United States. Us Inquiry Into Fbi Clinton Spurred By Republicans Ends Without Results: Washington PostBy Makini Brice 3 Min Read WASHINGTON – A U.S. Justice Department inquiry into Republican allegations of misconduct at the department and the FBI, including its handling of investigations related to 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, effectively ended without tangible results, the Washington Post reported on Thursday. Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions appointed here John Huber, Utah’s top federal prosecutor, to look into matters including allegations that the FBI had not fully pursued possible corruption cases at the Clinton Foundation and during her tenure as U.S. Secretary of State, when the federal government allowed the sale of a company called Uranium One, the Post reported. The assignment has ended, but no official notice has been sent to the Justice Department or to lawmakers, the Washington Post reported washingtonpost.com/national-security/justice-dept-winds-down-clinton-related-inquiry-once-championed-by-trump-it-found-nothing-of-consequence/2020/01/09/ca83932e-32f9-11ea-a053-dc6d944ba776_story.html. Current and former law enforcement officials said they had not expected the probe to uncover anything, according to the newspaper. A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2017, Republican lawmakers opened here a congressional investigation into the 2010 sale of Uranium One, a Canadian company that owned 20 percent of U.S. uranium supplies, to a Russian government firm. The Gop Pushed Benghazi Probes For Years Its Already Done With Jan 6Republicans spent years pushing for investigation after investigation of the tragedy in Benghazi, Libya. But when it comes to the Jan. 6 insurrection, theyre already very much over it. A new poll from Quinnipiac University is the latest to show Republicans dont really want any type of investigation of the riots at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. The poll gave people a choice between the idea that it was an attack on democracy that should never be forgotten, and the idea that its overblown and its time to move on. Three-quarters of Republicans 75 percent chose move on. That binary choice is a little overly simplistic, admittedly. It asks people to choose between two polar opposites, when they might be more in the middle. But when asked whether they support Congresss investigation of Jan. 6, GOP support for the probe isnt much higher. Just 29 percent of Republicans support the probe. It might be tempting to view this as a symptom of how the probe is being conducted, rather than the necessity of some kind of investigation. Republicans cried foul over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejecting GOP picks for the select committee, and Republicans voted overwhelmingly against both an independent commission and Pelosis fallback plan for a select committee. But polling suggests thats not really the case that this really is about just not wanting to investigate at all.
Effects Of Radical Reconstruction
KKK Democrats Lynching Killing Black & White ‘Radical Republicans’
What were the goals of RadicalReconstruction and how did it lead to changes in ideas of American citizenship?Reconstruction refers to the period of time post-civil-war when the goal was to bring the South into submission and protect the African American Civil Rights. The federal government set the conditions that would allow for the Rebellious Southern States back into the Union. This was a very complex time for our country and many goalswere set in order to bring everyone together to live in PremiumUlysses S. Grant,;Reconstruction era of the United States,;Abraham Lincoln 1242 Words | 4 Pages Why Was The Radical Republican Plan For Reconstruction ConsideredRadical ReconstructionRadical Republicans The Radical Republicansreconstruction offered all kinds of new opportunities to African Americans, including the vote , property ownership, education, legal rights, and even the possibility of holding political office. By the beginning of 1868, about 700,000 African Americans were registered voters. Likewise, what were the goals of the Radical Republicans during Reconstruction? They wanted to prevent the leaders of the confederacy from returning to power after the war, they wanted the republican party to become a powerful institution in the south, and they wanted the federal government to help african americans achieve political equality by guaranteeing their rights to vote in the south. Beside above, what were three policies that the Radical Republicans proposed for reconstruction? On the political front, the Republicans wanted to maintain their wartime agenda, which included support for:
How did the presidents plan for reconstruction differ from the plan of the Radical Republicans? the presidents plan was a quicker eeasier plan, not allowing for a lot of the south to agree just ten percent. Southern laws designed to restrict the rights of the newly freed black slaves. What Did President Johnsons Reconstruction Plan IncludeIn 1865 President Andrew Johnson implemented a plan of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom and offered no role to blacks in the politics of the South. The end of the Civil War found the nation without a settled Reconstruction policy. Read Also: How Many Republicans In Congress What Was Thaddeus Stevens Greatest AchievementStevens drafted his own version of the 13th Amendment, but when it failed to gain support, he shepherded a more popular version through Congress. It ended slavery in all states, whereas the Emancipation Proclamation only abolished slavery in the Confederacy. Stevens also guided the 14th Amendment through Congress. What Were The 3 Goals Of The Radical RepublicansThey wanted to prevent the leaders of the confederacy from returning to power after the war, they wanted the republican party to become a powerful institution in the south, and they wanted the federal government to help african americans achieve political equality by guaranteeing their rights to vote in the south. Recommended Reading: Liberal Congress Members Which Of The Following Was A Provision Of The Reconstruction Act Of 1867The Reconstruction Acts of 1867 laid out the process for readmitting Southern states into the Union. The Fourteenth Amendment provided former slaves with national citizenship, and the Fifteenth Amendment granted black men the right to vote. Why Was The Radical Republican Plan For Reconstruction Considered RadicalWhy was the Radical Republican plan for Reconstruction considered radical? The Radical Republican plan was considered radical because it involved completely reforming and re-creating Southern society. Former slaves were empowered, and many even entered into politics. To accomplish this, the US Army had to occupy many Southern states in order to protect the newly freed Black population and ensure their right to vote. Who are the experts?Our certified Educators are real professors, teachers, and scholars who use their academic expertise to tackle your toughest questions. Educators go through a rigorous application process, and every answer they submit is reviewed by our in-house editorial team. M.A. from University of Massachusetts-Boston Educator since 2018 Congressional Reconstruction is often referred to as Radical Reconstruction because it involved big bold plans. Presidential Reconstruction as envisioned by Lincoln and Johnson was meant to be lenient to the former Confederacy in order to encourage reunification and heal the wounds of the Civil War. Radical Republicans in Congress had Read Also: Republican Party Lapel Pins What Was Part Of The Wade Davis Bill Proposed By Radical RepublicansThe Wade-Davis Bill required that 50 percent of a states white males take a loyalty oath to be readmitted to the Union. In addition, states were required to give blacks the right to vote. Congress passed the Wade-Davis Bill, but President Lincoln chose not to sign it, killing the bill with a pocket veto. How Would The Passage Of The Wade Davis Bill
Trump In Texas: Radical Democrats Want To ‘Incite Riots’ | MTP Daily | MSNBC
The Wade-Davis Bill required that a majority of prewar southern voters swear loyalty to the Union. The Wade-Davis Bill passed by the Radical Republicans demanded guarantees of African American equality. Lincoln killed this bill with a pocket veto.Lincolns plan did not guarantee African American equality. You May Like: Why Are Republicans Wearing Blue Ties The Tenure Of Office ActIn addition to the Reconstruction Acts, Congress alsopassed a series of bills in 1867 tolimit President Johnsons power, one of which was the Tenureof Office Act. The bill sought to protect prominentRepublicans in the Johnson administration by forbiddingtheir removal without congressional consent. Although the act appliedto all officeholders whose appointment required congressional approval, Republicanswere specifically aiming to keep Secretary of War Edwin M.Stanton in office, because Stanton was the Republicans conduitfor controlling the U.S. military. Defiantly, Johnson ignored theact, fired Stanton in the summer of 1867 , and replaced him with Union general UlyssesS. Grant. Afraid that Johnson would end Military Reconstructionin the South, Congress ordered him to reinstate Stanton when itreconvened in 1868.Johnson refused, but Grant resigned, and Congress put Edwin M. Stantonback in office over the presidents objections. The postwar Radical Republicans were motivated by three main factors:
Teaching The Newly Freed Population
The US Reconstruction Plans
Sea-island School, No. 1,St. Helena Island. Established in April 1862.Education among the Freedmen, ca. 1866-70. Broadside. Page 2. Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Library of Congress. Reproduction Number: LC-USZ62-107754 Bookmark this item: //https://ift.tt/3kqKe0h Effects Of Radical ReconstructionWhat were the goals of RadicalReconstruction and how did it lead to changes in ideas of American citizenship?Reconstruction refers to the period of time post-civil-war when the goal was to bring the South into submission and protect the African American Civil Rights. The federal government set the conditions that would allow for the Rebellious Southern States back into the Union. This was a very complex time for our country and many goalswere set in order to bring everyone together to live in PremiumUlysses S. Grant,;Reconstruction era of the United States,;Abraham Lincoln 1242 Words | 4 Pages You May Like: Why Are Republicans Wearing Blue Ties African Americans During Radical ReconstructionAfter the Emancipation Proclamation and the end of the Civil War countless African Americans who were once held in bondage were considered free. With slavery demolished and the once enslaved Africans freed there came the question of what about the freed African Americans and what would become of the South? You see under the administration of President Andrew Johnson in 1865 and 1866 new southern state legislatures PremiumAmerican Civil War,;African American,;Black people 1394 Words | 6 Pages You May Like: Are The Republicans Backing Trump What Were The Key Elements Of Radical ReconstructionRadical Republican Reconstruction Plan
Impeachment of Andrew Johnson by the Senate 1866 In 1866 the Radical Republican Congress sought to remove President Andrew Johnson from office. This was part of the power struggle between Johnson who sought highly lenient policies towards the former Confederate states and the Radical Republicans who wanted a harsher version of Reconstruction as well as more forceful protection of the rights of the newly freed southern black population. Ultimately the impeachment, which was not popular or supported by the general public, failed by one vote. You May Like: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans The Radical Republicans After The Death Of Thaddeus StevensThaddeus Stevens died on August 11, 1868. After lying in the state in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol, he was buried in a cemetery in Pennsylvania he had chosen as it allowed burials of both White and Black people. The faction of Congress he had led continued, though without his fiery temperament much of the fury of the Radical Republicans subsided. Plus, they tended to support the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant, who took office in March 1869. You May Like: Democratic Controlled States Understanding The Old Confederate AntiThe following paragraph is meant to illustrate the logic of the old Confederates, this is not my stance, this is just an example of the type of justification an anti-Radical Republican like Clymer might have given , The Rich Elite Radical Republicans want;Black suffrage;so they can;make African Americans;THE EQUALS of the poor white man . Those newly granted votes will;be used to assert the Republican ideology, to ensure their rule, and to punish the south. With that the Republican elite will rule both the negro and the poor white man, stripping their liberties one-by-one. Their radical reconstruction policy and call for Negro suffrage;isnt a compromise like the three-fifths or the other compromises their social policy is just a thinly veiled;attempt at taking control away from the states and ensuring Republican control of the central government. So, like it was with states rights and individual liberty being a justification for slavery pre-Civil War, the post-War logic of the Confederates is a little hard to grapple with today. With that said, even if their logic was valid, doesnt it make the;modern Democratic Party, who had;93% of the black vote under Obama, into the Rich Elite Radical Social Liberal of today? Even by the old logic of the anti-Radical-Republican of the 1860s, the parties switched. Also Check: How Many Republicans In Congress What Was The Main Goal Of The Military Reconstruction Act QuizletOne of the main goals of Military Reconstruction was to guarantee the voting rights of the freedmen. Then, What were the main features of the Reconstruction Act? The measures main points included: Creation of five military districts in the seceded states Each district was to be headed by a military official empowered to appoint and remove state officials. What were three goals of the Radical Republicans during Reconstruction? They wanted to prevent the leaders of the confederacy from returning to power after the war, they wanted the republican party to become a powerful institution in the south, and they wanted the federal government to help african americans achieve political equality by guaranteeing their rights to vote in the south. Keeping this in consideration, What are the major differences between presidential Reconstruction and Congressional Reconstruction? The main difference between Presidential and Congressional Reconstruction was the degree of leniency they afforded to former confederate states. Under the Presidential Reconstruction plans of Lincoln and Johnson, confederate states would be granted readmission to the Union comparatively easily. Related Contents Recommended Reading: Trump Interview People Magazine 1998 Who Uses Radical RepublicansThe Radical Republicans played an important role in US history, and they are widely referenced in formal discussions of the Civil War and Reconstruction. Contemporary liberal and progressive American politicians who push strongly for reforms and champion racial equality may be compared to the Radical Republicans, despite the irony that historic Democrats variously opposed the empowerment of black Americans. Alternatively, members of the modern conservative Republican Party who are particularly vehement about their political ideologies may be called Radical Republicans, though their positions may far from resemble their partys historic ones. Outside of the United States, a Radical Republican Party existed in early 20th-century Spain, and is used in the context of Spanish history as well. Abraham Lincoln’s Assassination And Radical Reconstruction
Lecture 33: Radical Reconstruction
assassination affected the nation was that the original plan for reconstruction changed and his death created a larger time period of racism segregation and discrimination. If Lincoln had survived his plans for reconstruction would have been successful. Instead his death led to an open spot for someone else to take over and make those decisions. Of course Andrew Johnson would take over since he was vice president at that time. Radical Republicans saw that there was a way to punish those who rebelled PremiumAmerican Civil War,;United States,;Abraham Lincoln 300 Words | 2 Pages Read Also: Who Gives More Democrats Or Republicans What Did Radical Republicans In Congress Think About President Johnsons Reconstruction Plan Answer ChoicesThe Radical Republicans opposed Lincolns plan because they thought it too lenient toward the South. Radical Republicans believed that Lincolns plan for Reconstruction was not harsh enough because, from their point of view, the South was guilty of starting the war and deserved to be punished as such. The Civil Service HalfAlthough the factions of Republicans can be found from Civil War to the end of Reconstruction, the;heyday of the above factions was during the Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, and;Ulysses S. Grant administrations. Here we see two types of Republicans, one who wants social justice and one who is pro-business . Simply, as the argument of Reconstruction ended key voter issues switched and the debate;became more about stances on Gilded-Age business policy and less about reforming the south . Reconstruction ultimately ended in a corrupt bargain or;Compromise of 1877, which was struck by Republicans over the 1877 election.;In the bargain Republicans traded the end of Reconstruction for the Presidency, and from then on we get an awkward 100 year lull. First we get Plessy v. Ferguson, and then black codes and Jim Crowe. It isnt until;LBJ finally signed Civil Rights 1964 and Voting Rights 1965 that the battle the radical Republicans started saw real progress again. It was Civil Rights that;marked the true victory that had been fought for since;the 1860s, and perhaps it isnt surprising that this resulted in many of the Southern Conservative faction of the Democratic party becoming Republicans over time. The full story is way more complex, but we tell it here. TIP: Radical is an insult used;by ;as far back as the late 1700s and is still used today. It is a less friendly way to say . Recommended Reading: Did The Republicans Win The House Who Opposed The Ten Percent Planthe Radical RepublicansAlthough the Radical Republicans were the minority party in Congress, they managed to sway many moderates in the postwar years and came to dominate Congress in later sessions. In the summer of 1864, the Radical Republicans passed a new bill to oppose the plan, known as the WadeDavis Bill. Recommended Reading: Nancy Pelosi Voting Record Govtrack What Were The Goals Of Radical ReconstructionAfter the election of November 6, 1866, Congress imposes its own Reconstruction policies, referred to by historians as Radical Reconstruction. This re-empowers the Freedmans Bureau and sets reform efforts in motion that will lead to the 14th and 15th Amendments, which, respectively, grant citizenship to all Recommended Reading: Did Trump Call Republicans Stupid In 1998 What Were The 3 Goals Of Radical RepublicansThey wanted to prevent the leaders of the confederacy from returning to power after the war, they wanted the republican party to become a powerful institution in the south, and they wanted the federal government to help african americans achieve political equality by guaranteeing their rights to vote in the south. The Fisk Jubilee SingersA series of tours by the Fisk Jubilee Singers was one of the most important factors in the spread of the spiritual. The first tour in 1871 was to raise money for Fisk University. It was the hearing of these spirituals as sung by the Fisk Jubilee Singers that first made general audiences conscious of their beauty. The first collection of the Fisk Singers spirituals was published in 1872. An expanded and reset collection appeared in 1875 as an appendix to a history of the Jubilee Singers. These editions, which were sold as souvenirs at concerts, spread the spirituals in print as the Jubilee Singers themselves spread them in performance. This publication includes only a single spiritual sung by the Fisk Jubilee Singers, although the Librarys music collections include many recordings of the Singers, as well as published music. I Am the Door.From Songs of the Jubilee Singers from Fisk University. Sheet music. Cincinnati: John Church & Co., 1884. Music Division, Library of Congress Bookmark this item: //https://ift.tt/2UTfU5L Recommended Reading: Where Do Democrats And Republicans Sit In Congress Reconstruction And Radical RepublicansThe Reconstruction was a period in the U.S. history at the end of, and immediately after, the Civil War. Although the North won the military conflict, political and ideological differences had to be resolved. President Abraham Lincoln put forward a long-term plan to reintegrate the South states as a first step to achieving this reconciliation. However, before this plan could be fully realized, he was assassinated. As a result, president Andrew Johnsons poor performance allowed a radical Republican faction to take the majority in Congress, accelerating the intended ideological and political changes. This factions reforms caused a strong backlash from the South, opposing the Radicals policy of emancipation and equal rights for the freed African Americans. Although the federal government had fully abolished slavery through the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, former Confederate legislatures were passing laws that would severely limit African Americans rights and freedoms. As Dunning provides the Northern views, these laws preserved the substance though avoiding the name of slavery . Effectively, they were sidestepping the Amendments except as a punishment for crime clause by criminalizing certain acts specifically for African Americans . What Is The Difference Between Presidential And Radical Reconstruction
Reconstruction in 6.5 Minutes
The main difference between Presidential and Congressional Reconstruction was the degree of leniency they afforded to former confederate states. Under Congressional Reconstruction, former confederate states would have to meet stricter demands, such as the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. Don’t Miss: How Many Senate Seats Do The Republicans Have What Was The Radical Republican Plan4.5/5Radical Republicansanswer here The Radical Republicans believed blacks were entitled to the same political rights and opportunities as whites. They also believed that the Confederate leaders should be punished for their roles in the Civil War. Also Know, what was the Radical Republicans plan for reconstruction quizlet? States had to ratify the 13th & 14th amendment, and enacted Military Control of Reconstruction with the Military Reconstruction Act. Radical plan wanted to punish the south, while Lincoln and Johnson wanted to reunite the union as quickly as possible. Then, who were the Radical Republicans and what were their goals? The Radical Republicans were a faction of the Republican Party during the American Civil War. They were distinguished by their fierce advocacy for the abolition of slavery, enfranchisement of black citizens, and holding the Southern states financially and morally culpable for the war. Who created the radical Republican plan? Senator Charles Sumner What Did Thaddeus Stevens Do For The Underground RailroadStevens was involved with the Underground Railroad, directly assisting runaway slaves. He also had what were possibly two interracial romantic relationships with women Dinah, a black servant in the 1820s, and his widowed housekeeper Lydia Hamilton Smith, a mulatto, in the two decades before his death in 1868. Recommended Reading: Did Trump Say Republicans Are Stupid What Did The Radical Republicans Do During ReconstructionThe Radical Republicans most important measures were contained in the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 and 1868, which placed the Southern states under military government and required universal manhood suffrage. Despite the Radical program, however, white control over Southern state governments was gradually restored. Understanding The American Republican Party Of ReconstructionWe explain three;different types of Republicans found in America during Civil War Reconstruction: moderate, conservative, and radical Republicans. Lincoln, the first Republican President,;was a moderate Republican like Ulysses S. Grant.;The moderate Republicans of Reconstruction took a centered stance on the South after the war. Meanwhile, Radical Republicans wanted stricter punishment of the Confederate ex-Democrat Rebels, and the Conservatives supported fewer reprimands;and quicker readmission into the Union for the South. Also Check: When Is The Last Time Republicans Controlled Congress Who Are The RadicalsRadicalism was a historical political movement within liberalism during the late 18th and early 19th centuries and a precursor to social liberalism. Its identified radicals were proponents of democratic reform in what subsequently became the parliamentary Radicals in the United Kingdom. The Legislation Passed By The Radical RepublicansQ8. Identify the legislation passed by the Radical Republicans in Congress in the 1860s that protected the rights of African Americans. Include in your analysis whether or not the legislations objectives were met? Q9.Why were African Americans unable to secure equal rights during Reconstruction? A. The Political Contest over Reconstruction 1. When Andrew Johnson assumed the presidency after Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, he maintained Lincolns lenient policies toward former Confederates. Radical Republicans were angered by the fact that Johnson quickly restored civil governments in Confederate states, granted amnesty to former Confederates, and displayed no concern for protecting the civil rights of freedpeople. 2. During the Civil War, Republicans led by Representative Thaddeus Stevens and Senator Charles Sumner had pressed for more aggressive military campaigns and a quicker end to slavery. These Republicans also introduced the Wade-Davis Bill, which was designed to reverse leniency toward Confederates. 3. In December 1865, Johnson announced that the Union was restored, and Radical Republicans were alarmed by the fact that representatives and senators from former Confederate states were slated to be reseated in Congress. Radical Republicans responded by forming a joint committee to examine issues of suffrage and representation for the former Confederate states. C. The Defeat of Reconstruction You May Like: Did The Republicans Free The Slaves Why Did Lincoln And Johnsons Plans FailThe Radical Republicans opposed Lincolns plan because they thought it too lenient toward the South. Radical Republicans believed that Lincolns plan for Reconstruction was not harsh enough because, from their point of view, the South was guilty of starting the war and deserved to be punished as such. What Are The Similarities And The Differences Between Lincoln The Radical Republicans And Johnsons Plan For Reconstruction
Presidential Reconstruction
Johnsons plan wasnt as willing to give as much freedom to newly free slaves as Lincolns was. Johnson wanted to give the land back to the south unlike the RR. Johnsons plan gave less protection to freed slaves then the Radical Republicans plan. Unlike the 10% plan, the plan they had wanted to punish the south. Read Also: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans What Were The Reconstruction PoliciesReconstruction was as much a national political configuration as a policy to restore the seceded states to the Union on terms of equal citizenship and civil rights. Beyond the sphere of government and politics, Reconstruction acquired a new semantic construction referring to social, economic, and cultural developments. What Was The Key Difference Between The Lincoln And Johnson Plans For Reconstruction QuizletWhat was the key difference between the Lincoln and Johnson plans for Reconstruction? Unlike Lincolns plan, Johnsons plan barred from political participation any ex-Confederate with taxable property worth $20,000 or more. How did the Thirteenth Amendment change the Constitution? It abolished slavery. Read Also: Why Are Republicans Wearing Blue Ties What Was Thaddeus Stevens PlanEnding slavery wasnt enough for Thaddeus Stevens. He proposed a plan to revolutionize Southern society: The Union Army would confiscate the plantations of the richest Southern aristocrats and distribute 40 acres of land to each adult male former slave. The whole fabric of Southern society must be changed, he said. Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/what-were-the-goals-of-radical-republicans/ Why We Arent Going To Panic
Can Trump help Republicans win the midterms?
We should all have our eyes wide open as we inch closer to the 2022 Midterms, but by no means should we give up hope. There are plenty of reasons why we can win the midterms. For starters, Democrats appear to be quite awake to how dangerous the Republican party has become in just the past few years. And since the Republicans dont appear to be any less radicalized with Trump out of the party, I dont think Democrats are going to go back to sleep. At this point in the election cycle, we dont have a full picture of who is retiring from Congress or who the candidates will be for these seats. Getting great candidates for crucial, must-win seats can energize voters and donors. Presidential approval seems to have an important effect on midterms and at this point, Bidens approval rating is 15 points higher than his disapproval. If he continues to do good things for Americans and keep his approval rating high, that will help the Democrats a lot. So, lets approach this midterm as clearly as possible: Our democracy is still on the line, and as awful as the Republicans are, they are in striking position to win back some power in Congress. Each of us needs to do everything we can to ensure that does not happen. If you arent already, consider subscribing to Political Charge as Ill be delving into specific actions we can take every month! If you want to win the midterms, please share this post with others who want to win, too! Senate Republican Leader Says Narrow Democratic Control Of House And Senate Makes Push Against President ImpracticalRepublican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Wednesday, I think we have a good chance of winning that election next year.Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Republican calls for removing President Biden from office over the Afghanistan withdrawal were impractical, urging GOP voters to focus instead on winning back the House and Senate in next years midterm elections. Look, there isnt going to be an impeachment, but I think we have a good chance of winning that election next year, Mr. McConnell said in remarks in his home state on Wednesday, in which he noted that Democrats could block any push to remove the president. What Would Happen If Republicans Win The Midterm ElectionsWithout a time machine, there’s nothing that can tell us with certainty what’s going to happen in the midterm elections, but there are plenty of metrics — polls, fundraising, historical trends, registration advantages, etc. — that can tell us what’s probable. And with 11 days remaining before Election Day, Democrats are likely to win a House majority, while Republicans are likely to keep the Senate. It’s understandable that many remain skeptical. After all, Hillary Clinton was favored to win the presidency two years ago. It wouldn’t take much of an electoral shift to produce results that are out of step with expectations. All of which raises the possibility of Republicans holding onto all of the levers of federal power for another two years. GOP officials effectively take it as a given that their Senate majority will be larger in the next Congress — NRSC Chairman Cory Gardner believes a 55-seat majority is within reach — and the Associated Press reported this week that leading Democrats “now fear the battle for the House majority will be decided by just a handful of seats.” The New York Times‘ David Leonhardt had a piece the other day on the implications of a successful GOP cycle. That sounds … about right. Leonhardt fleshed out his thesis by shining a light on a variety of developments he’d expect to see in the event of two more years of Republican rule, but there are basically four key areas that I’d recommend keeping an eye on: You May Like: Did Republicans And Democrats Switch Names What 3 Upcoming Elections Can Tell Us About The Political ClimateThe table below compares our retroactive generic-ballot polling averages as of Sept. 16 the year before a midterm election with the eventual House popular vote margin in the 1982-2018 midterms. It shows that the presidents party usually loses ground between this point in the cycle and the actual election. The presidents party often continues to lose groundChange between the presidents partys average margin in generic-ballot polling on Sept. 16 of the year before the midterm election* and its national House popular vote margin, in every midterm election from 1982-2018
*Using FiveThirtyEights current generic-ballot polling average methodology applied retroactively. Specifically, the generic-ballot polling average the previous September overestimates the presidents partys vote margin by an average of 3.5 points.4 This is the manifestation of one of the most ironclad rules in politics: The party that holds the White House almost always performs poorly in the midterms. Most Republicans Said That President Obama Should Be Impeached Because Of The 2012 Attack On The Us Consulate In BenghaziTheir own investigations, however, proved them wrong. Every Congressional inquiry, including those by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee, concluded that the Obama administration did nothing wrong regarding Benghazi, that there was no stand down order given, and that neither the President nor anyone in his administration lied about it. Each and every Republican investigation has reached this same conclusion, but Republicans continue to exploit this tragedy for political gain. Recommended Reading: Did Republicans And Democrats Switch Names Rep Jayapal Recounts Emotional Oval Office MomentAfter a rough month for President Joe Biden, Republicans think they have more than historical precedent on their side to retake the Senate in 2022. How Far Can A Governor Take Emergency PowersRepublicans have criticized Newsoms use of emergency power during the coronavirus pandemic, saying hes exerted too much control without the usual checks and balances. As the pandemic sidelined normal work in the Legislature last year, Newsom issued as many executive orders in 2020 as his predecessor did in eight years.; Assemblymember Kevin Kiley a Rocklin Republican now running in the recall election sued Newsom to try to limit his emergency power, but ultimately lost in court. With that ruling that a governor has broad authority to change or rescind laws during an emergency, GOP candidates are now talking about how theyd use such power themselves. I would not use executive authority to create new laws and new policies, as this governor has, Kiley said in an interview with CalMatters. But I would use it to unwind things that never shouldve been there to begin with.; Kiley said he would end Newsoms pandemic emergency declaration, which would set the stage for reversing related public health rules, such as the requirement that children wear masks at school and that state employees and health care workers get vaccinated against COVID-19 . Other GOP candidates also pledge to reverse Newsoms mask and vax orders.;;; But the major Republican recall candidates are talking about using emergency powers for a lot more than the pandemic.; Kevin Faulconer, the Republican former mayor of San Diego, said he would to speed up prevention efforts to clear trees and brush.; You May Like: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Us Midterm Elections: Obama Speaks At Rally In MiamiWe use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info The midterm elections give US citizens the chance to voice their feelings about a President halfway through his term. President Donald Trump was elected in 2016, and todays elections will determine how the remaining two years of his presidency pans out. Today polls will open across the country for US Citizens to cast their votes. It has been a close-run race between the Presidents party, the Republicans, and the Democrats. Ahead Of 2022 Midterms Republicans See Opening With Chaos In Afghanistan
Why Democrats and Republicans Are Claiming A Midterm Win
Washington With the chaotic evacuation of thousands of Americans and at-risk Afghans from Kabul dominating the headlines after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, Republicans see a political opening to use the fallout from President Biden’s withdrawal to question his capabilities, in hopes of wresting control of Congress from Democrats.; While foreign policy was not a top issuefor voters in the last two elections, “the challenge for the Biden administration is it sets a narrative of competence, or lack thereof, and Americans don’t like losing. Nobody likes losing, but especially in a way where you’re humiliated,” Glen Bolger, a Republican pollster who has worked on various congressional campaigns, told CBS News. The president has taken a hit from the chaos in Kabul. A CBS News poll released Sunday found 44% of Americans believe the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan has gone “very badly” though 63% of Americans approve of the drawdown. Forty-seven percent, meanwhile, approve of Mr. Biden’s handling of the withdrawal, down from 60% in July. The poll showed Mr. Biden’s overall job rating has fallen, too, with 50% of Americans saying they approve of his performance, an eight-point drop since July.; Voters, he said, “want candidates’ or politicians’ rhetoric to match their records.” Several;Republican;congressional candidates;are also highlighting the crisis in Afghanistan in sponsored posts on social media. Recommended Reading: Did Trump Say Republicans Are The Dumbest Colwell: Republicans Are Likely To Win Control Of The House Next Year ButThree reasons why Republicans are very likely to take control of the House next year involve things over which Democrats have little or no control. There is, however, one reason why Democrats might be able somehow to hang on to their slim majority. And they do have better prospects of at least holding on to the 50-50 Senate tie. Reasons for Republicans winning control of the House: FIRST: History is on their side. The party out of the White House almost always makes big gains in the first midterm election in a new presidency. In those midterm elections since the end of World War II, the average loss for the presidents party has been 29 seats. Democrats lost 63 seats in the 2010 midterm after election of President Barack Obama. Republicans lost 40 seats in the 2018 midterm after election of Donald Trump. Because Democrats already lost seats in 2020, even as Joe Biden won the presidency, Republicans need only a net of five seats to win the majority. Democrats cant go back to 2020 to win more seats. Factors in midterm losses for the presidents party include voters wanting a check on the president and disillusionment over any presidents inability to bring about everything voters hoped for. SECOND:;Redistricting after the census will result in many more safe Republican seats. Thats because Republicans control state legislatures in far more states than do Democrats. Both parties gerrymander. But it is the GOP controlling district drawing in many more states. Will 2022 Be A Good Year For RepublicansA FiveThirtyEight Chat Welcome to FiveThirtyEights politics chat. The transcript below has been lightly edited. sarah : Were still more than a year away from the 2022 midterm elections, which means it will be a while before we should take those general election polls too seriously. But with a number of elections underway in 2021, not to mention a number of special elections, its worth kicking off the conversation around what we do and dont know about Republicans and Democrats odds headed into the midterms. Lets start big picture. The longstanding conventional wisdom is that midterm elections generally go well for the party thats not in the White House. Case in point: Since 1946, the presidents party has lost, on average, 27 House seats. What are our initial thoughts? Is the starting assumption that Republicans should have a good year in 2022? alex : Yes, and heres why: 2022 will be the first federal election after the House map are redrawn. And because Democrats fell short of their 2020 expectations in state legislative races, Republicans have the opportunity to redraw congressional maps that are much more clearly in their favor. On top of that, Republicans are already campaigning on the cost and magnitude of President Bidens policy plans to inspire a backlash from voters. geoffrey.skelley :Simply put, as that chart above shows, the expectation is that Democrats, as the party in the White House, will lose seats in the House.; nrakich : What they said! Don’t Miss: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans What If The Republicans Win Everything AgainTotal victory for the G.O.P. would mean Trump unleashed. Opinion Columnist The end of Robert Muellers investigation. The loss of health insurance for several million people. New laws that make it harder to vote. More tax cuts for the rich. More damage to the environment. A Republican Party molded even more in the image of President Trump. These are among the plausible consequences if the Republicans sweep the midterm elections and keep control of both the House and Senate. And dont fool yourself. That outcome, although not the most likely one, remains possible. The last couple of weeks of polling have shown how it could happen. Voters who lean Republican including whites across the South could set aside their disappointment with Trump and vote for Republican congressional candidates. Voters who lean left including Latinos and younger adults could turn out in low numbers, as they usually do in midterm elections. The Republicans continuing efforts to suppress turnout could also swing a few close elections. No matter what, Democrats will probably win the popular vote in the House elections, for the first time since 2012. Trump, after all, remains unpopular. But the combination of gerrymandering and the concentration of Democratic voters in major cities means that a popular-vote win wont automatically translate into a House majority. Midterm Alert: What Happens If Republicans Actually Keep CongressHouse Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. The Democrats are expected to win back the House. But what if… they dont? An increasing, albeit tiny, number of individual investors, research firms, think tank associates and hedge funds have told me in the last week that they doubt there will be a blue wave during Tuesday’s midterm election. All of them think the GOP manage to keep a tiny majority in the House and actually gain seats in the Senante. The House is expected to flip, as is historical president. President Trump is the key issue on the ballot, with a blue wave, and even a blue ripple, seen as a testament to American disdain for his crass style of politics. But what happens if the Republicans pull off another 2016-style upset and hold onto the House of Representatives? Thats no one’s base-case scenario in the market. Consensus gives them a one-in-four chance of keeping the Democrats out of power. The Senate still remains Republican, everyone believes. But lets suppose that the generic polls that investors are basing;the midterms on fail to get to the heart of head-to-head races. And the Republicans manage to squeak out a victory and hold onto the legislative and executive branches. One thing for sure, the Trump opposition would go ballistic. Another surety: the stock market skyrockets, say analysts from BNP Paribas. This scenario would represent a significant surprise for markets, BNPs;U.S. Team of Economics and Strategy wrote in a 12-page report published this week. Recommended Reading: What Year Did The Democrats And Republicans Switch Can Democrats Avoid A Wipeout In 2022Bidens plan: Go big or go home. The good news for Democrats who watched Joe Biden unveil a historically ambitious agenda last night is that newly elected presidents have almost always passed some version of their core economic planparticularly when their party controls both congressional chambers, as Bidens does now. The bad news: Voters have almost always punished the presidents party in the next midterm election anyway. The last two times Democrats had unified controlwith Bill Clinton in 199394 and Barack Obama in 200910they endured especially resounding repudiations in the midterms, which cost Clinton his majority in both chambers and Obama the loss of the House. Theres a very different strategy this time, David Price, a Democratic representative from North Carolina and a former political scientist, told me. Theres an openness now to the sense that a bolder plan, ironically, might have greater appeal for independents and others we need to attract than trying to trim and split the difference with Republicans. There is this recognition of this moment and how fleeting it is, and an evaluation that, absent the trifecta of control, it is very hard to move big policy, said a senior official at one of the partys leading outside advocacy groups, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategizing. So you have to take your shot. I think thats part of what undergirds Go big. What If 19 Alternate Histories Imagining A Very Different WorldAlternate history, long popular with fiction writers, has also been explored by historians and journalists. Here are some of their intriguing conclusions. 1. What if the South won the Civil War?Effect: America becomes one nation again in 1960. Explanation: In a 1960 article published in Look magazine, author and Civil War buff MacKinlay Kantor envisioned a history in which the Confederate forces won the Civil War in 1863, forcing the despised President Lincoln into exile. The Southern forces annex Washington, DC renaming it the District of Dixie. The USA moves its capital to Columbus, Ohio now called ;Columbia but can no longer afford to buy Alaska from the Russians. Texas, unhappy with the new arrangement, declares its independence in 1878. Under international pressure, the Southern states gradually abolish slavery. After fighting together in two world wars, the three nations are reunified in 1960 a century after South Carolinas secession had led to the Civil War in the first place. 2. What if Charles Lindbergh were elected President in 1940?Effect: America joins the Nazis. 3. What if Hitler successfully invaded Russia?Effect: The Fuhrer is revered in history as a great leader. 4. What if James Dean had survived his car crash?Effect: Robert Kennedy survives his assassination attempt. 5. What if President Kennedy had survived the assassination attempt?Effect: Republicans win every election for the next 30 years. Read Also: How Many Federal Judges Are Republicans You May Like: Why Are Republicans Wearing Blue Ties Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/what-happens-if-republicans-win-the-midterms/ The Rise Of Modern Social Liberalism And Social Conservatism
Why Did the Democratic and Republican Parties Switch Platforms?
Later we get a third way with Bill Clintons New Democrats. This third way is an extension;of the;progressive bourbon liberal wing, but mashed-up with the progressive social liberal wing, and Reagan-era;conservatism. These three social liberal ideologies which Clinton embodied can collectively be referred to as an;American liberalism. These factions, which we can today denote as;progressive, neoliberal, and social liberal, can be used to differentiate types of liberals on the political left from the New Deal Coalition and the modern Democratic party of today. TIP: As noted above in the introduction, there is no one way to understand Americas political ideologies, but each angle we look at things from helps us to better understand;bits of the historic puzzle. Republicans And Democrats After The Civil WarIts true that many of the first Ku Klux Klan members were Democrats. Its also true that the early Democratic Party opposed civil rights. But theres more to it. The Civil War-era GOP wasnt that into civil rights. They were more interested in punishing the South for seceding, and monopolizing the new black vote. In any event, by the 1890s, Republicans had begun to distance themselves from civil rights. An Overview Of The Platform Switching By Party System And President From The Founders To EisenhowerThe First and Second Party Systems included some important changes and debates. Examples included the argument;over the Federalist favored Constitution, and the Anti-Federalist favored Articles of Confederation;and Bill of Rights;and debates over slavery, modernization, and;banking.;Major;changes began;at the end of the Second Party System. The Second Party system ended with the;Whig Party dissolving;in 1854. They were critically divided by the;Kansas-Nebraska Act;and the related debate over;manifest destiny and popular sovereignty;. The heated battle;over whether;Kansas should be a slave state, and the debate over whether the south could keep expanding southward creating slave states,;resulted in the country being split.;This had happened in the Mexican-American war.;One;faction became the Northern Republicans and their;allies the Union, who wanted to hold together the Union under a strong central government. The other became the Southern ex-Democrats and their allies the Confederacy, who wanted independence;and wanted to expand southward, to for instance Cuba, creating new slave states. By the time;Lincoln took;office in 1861, the division was inescapable FACT: The tension was so great the Democratic party ceased to exist from 1861 1865 as the Confederacy rejected the;concept of party systems; which is why we refer to;them ex-Democrats above. Recommended Reading: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Recommended Reading: Dems For Trump Summarizing The Party Systems As A TwoCurrent events and complexities aside, there has almost always been a two-party system in the United States. The mentality of each party can be expressed as northern;interests and southern interests, although I strongly prefer city interests and rural interests . Sometimes we see both;interests;in the same party, as;with Humphrey and LBJ, and sometimes it is less clear cut, but we can always spot it in any era. Thus, we can use a simple two party answer as to which factions;held which interests over time, which I hope will be seen as helpful, and not divisive.;Remember the U.S. is a diverse Union;of 50 sovereign states and commonwealths where the need to get a majority divides us into red states and blue states as a matter of custom, not as enemies, but as a United Republic with a democratic spirit.
TIP: One way to;summarize all of this is by saying the changes happened under, or as a result of, key figures including Jefferson and Hamilton, Adams and Jackson, Lincoln, Grant, Cleveland, Bryan, the Roosevelts, Wilson, Hoover, LBJ, and Clinton. See a;comparison of the political ideology of each President from Washington to Obama. A Summary Of Party Systems Realigning Elections And Switching Factions In The Major Us Political PartiesNow that we have the essential basics down, lets do an overview of all the changes . Historians refer to the eras the changes;resulted in as party systems. Each party system is defined by realigning elections or otherwise important elections like the elections of 1800,;1828, 1860,;1876, 1892,;1896,;1912, 1928,;1932, 1948,;1964,;1968, 1980,;1992, and;2000, key voter issues of the day like states rights, workers rights, social welfare, equal rights, central banking, and currency debates, and which factions were;in which parties at the time like;the New Deal Coalition and Conservative Coalition;. Or, in a very general sentence, Solid South States Rights and Tea party-esquePopulist;Conservatives in the Democratic Party;and elite Social Liberal Progressives;in the Republican Party essentially switched parties from roughly 1900 to 2000, which resulted in red and blue states flipping from north to south . That said, to complicate things, the Federalist line was historically anti-immigrant and nationalist and gave birth to the first Tea Party-like entities;the Know-Nothings in the North;and Anti-Masons in the North. Despite this truism however, the Civil War forced factions to choose sides over slavery and expansion. Consequently, the Whig-allied;nativist populist factions disbanded, the New Republican Party formed, and ultimately the first Republican President Lincoln was no Know-Nothing. Don’t Miss: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans This Is Not A New ArgumentPrinceton University Edwards Professor of American History Tera Hunter told USA TODAY that this trope is a fallback argument used to discredit current Democratic Party policies. At the core of the effort to discredit the current Democratic Party is the refusal to accept the realignment of the party structure in the mid-20th century, Hunt said. In September, NPR host Shereen Marisol Maraji called the claim, one of the most well-worn clapbacks in modern American politics. Comedian Trevor Noah tackled the misleading trope on an episode of “The Daily Show” in March 2016, after two CNN contributors debated the topic. Every time I go onto Facebook I see these things: Did you know the Democrats are the real racist party and did you know the Republicans freed the slaves? Noah joked. A lot of people like to skip over the fact that when it comes to race relations, historically, Republicans and Democrats switched positions. A similar meme attributing the claim;to U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;Ben Carson has been circulating;on social media since November 2016. Who started the KKK? That was Democrats. Who was the party of slavery? Who was the part of Jim Crow and segregation? Who opposed the Civil Rights Movement? Who opposed voting rights? It was all the Democrats, the meme reads. Other posts making more specific;claims about the Democratic Party;starting the Civil War or founding the KKK continue to circulate. What Does Democratic MeanStarting alphabetically, the word means pertaining to or of the nature of democracy or a democracy. Simply put, the lowercase democratic is a word used to refer to anything that resembles or has to do with a , a form of in which the supreme power rests with the people and is exercised by them directly or by politicians that they elect to them. In practice, this is usually accomplished through a fair, organized system of voting, in which; or cast votes in support of political or societal issues .; So, the word democratic is used to describe government systems that are or resemble democracies and the people that run these types of governments. The United States of America is a representative democracy in which the people elect representatives to perform the demands of politics on their behalf. This is why we say that the US is a democratic country or that we have a democratic form of government.; The English word democratic dates all the way back to the late 1500 and early 1600s. It is derived from the Greek word dmokratía . The government system of the ancient Greek of Athens, in which the people held the power , is considered the worlds first democracy. Considering that Athens was a slave-owning society, its form of democracy was much different than the democratic governments of today.; You May Like: Democrat Controlled States The Kkk Was Founded By Democrats But Not The PartyThe Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866 by ex-Confederate soldiers Frank McCord, Richard Reed, John Lester, John Kennedy, J. Calvin Jones and James Crowe in Pulaski, Tennessee. The group was originally a social club but quickly became a violent white supremacist group. Its first grand wizard was Nathan Bedford Forrest, an ex-Confederate general and prominent slave trader. Fact check: Experts agree the KKK attracted many ex-Confederate soldiers and Southerners who opposed Reconstruction, most of whom were Democrats. Forrest even spoke at the 1868 Democratic National Convention. The KKK is almost a paramilitary organization thats trying to benefit one party. It syncs up with the Democratic Party, which really was a;racist party openly at the time, Grinspan said. But the KKK isnt the Democratic Party, and the Democratic Party isnt the KKK. Although the KKK did serve the Democratic Partys interests, Grinspan stressed that not all Democrats supported the KKK. The Anti-Defamation Leagues Center on Extremism senior fellow Mark Pitcavage told the Associated Press that many KKK members were Democrats because the Whig Party had died off and Southerners disliked Republicans after the Civil War. Despite KKK members’ primary political affiliation, Pitcavage said it is wrong to say the Democratic Party started the KKK. Fact check:Yes, historians do teach that first Black members of Congress were Republicans A General Summary Of The Party Switching And Party Systems
Why Did the Democratic South Become Republican?
Above I offered summaries in the for of bullet; pointed lists. Below Ill try to weave everything together into a story to offer another perspective: As America became increasingly progressive over time, from 1776 forward, different socially conservative and socially liberal movements banded together to create the parties of each of the 6-7;Party Systems;. This caused different;social-minded factions to align with different business-minded factions over time , and this changed the parties . Oddly enough, this resulted in the previously Small Government Populist Democratic Party becoming the party of Big Government, Neoliberalism, Progressivism, Globalization, and Social Liberalism, and the previously Big Government Aristocratic party Republican Party becoming the party of;Small Government , Nativism, and Social Conservatism. Oddly again, despite the changes the Republicans have always been Protectionist, Nationalist, and Stricter on immigration . On that note, it is very important to understand that immigration changed the Democratic Party as they embraced new non-Anglo Protestant immigrants over time. The tricky thing to grasp is that some conservatives want to conserve back to a time that they feel they had more freedom and that progressive social liberalism requires Big Government to implement. How the Republican Party went from Lincoln to Trump. Read Also: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Who Are The Racists And When Did They Switch Political PartiesWatch the short video here: Whos The Real Racist? Democratic apologists instantly posted comments dismissing that claim, arguing that everybody knows that in the 1960s and 1970s, the racists within the Democrat Party left and became Republicans. 1 Is the claim true? Did the racist Democrats become the Republicans in the 1960s and 1970s who took over the south? According to liberal Wikipedia, throughout the decades of Democratic racism, the South was known as The Solid Democratic South, composed of 16 states plus Washington, D.C., including Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas. 2 So did the racist Democrats switch in the 1960s and 1970s to become the Republicans who took over those states? Definitely not. How Do We Know? During the time of Reconstruction, as noted above with the Alabama poster, Republicans controlled the legislatures and were the Party of black Americans. But when Reconstruction ended in 1876, so, too, did Republican control of the South. The Democrats regained the control of those states that they held before the Civil War. So from the time of Reconstruction until the current time, did Republicans control the south in the 1960s and 1970s as critics claim? In Louisiana, it was not until 2011 that the state legislature again became Republican. 5 For decades after the 60s and 70s, it, too, remained Democrat. With That Said It Is More Complex Than We Can Just SayWith everything thus far said, we have only skimmed the surface. The truth is, be we talking about the South or not, not every faction changes, and we have to account for more history than can fit in any essay. We have to account for;changing platforms, changing voter bases, congressional changes over decades, battles between factions within states and parties, the changing ideologies of factions and parties, technological changes of automation and modernization, business interested elites in both parties who tend to organize better and dominate, populists in both parties who cant always agree on divisive social issues, the general rift between key voter issues and social issues vs. economic issues, arguments over the size of state within parties, voter issues taking on new importances, single issue third parties, global politics, and so much else to fully tell this story. This is to say, the;history of the major U.S. political parties if of course more complex than can just be said which is why we use terms like parties switched and party systems to preface this;long in depth essay. Don’t Miss: How Many Democrats And Republicans In The Senate The Republican Sixth Party Strategy Where The Tea Party And AltEverything noted so far leads up to one other thing that needs to be discussed on its own . After Voting Rights 1965 it wasnt just a matter of switching the South, it was a matter of taking that 1930s conservative coalition to the next level and the Republicans;switching themselves . No social conservative faction was strong enough on its own to win an election, not after Voting Rights, but together, under a strategically planned big tent, the social conservatives and establishment conservatives;could create a siren-like;Frankensteins monster;to push for free-enterprise; and socially conservative values against the progressive state an increasingly progressive Democratic Party . This story involves: The Powell memo, the southern strategy, the John Birch Society, the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine, Goldwater, Nixon, Reagan, Norquist, Roger Aisle, Lee Atwater, Karl Rove, Fox News, Reagan, Right-Wing Radio, Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, and a vast;right-wing conspiracy aimed at getting;the many different social conservative and establishment conservative factions to adopt;each;others ideology . Essentially, the Conservative Coalition in their fight against Communism and liberal democrats since WWI, but especially when their hand was forced post 1965, have created the modern right-wing populist political machine to counter the lefts own political machine . This Isnt Just About The Solid SouthStill, I get that this is about first and foremost debunking the Big Switch, so lets split the difference. First, well offer a quick summary in the form of an introduction . Then well explain the general;story, which shows;that the main theme here is one of factions switching parties in a two-party system as America progresses;and modernizes . Then we move on to the details of the Big Switch; as one can see in the congressional;voting records of the contemporary era; see the Southern strategy). Then well tell the full history of both major parties, noting each switch, each President, and major events. First, a bit more on the Solid South . Read Also: Snopes Trump Republican Dumb Don’t Miss: How Many Democrats And Republicans Are In The House The Parties Change CourseAfter the war, the Republican Party became more and more oriented towards economic growth, industry, and big business in Northern states, and in the beginning of the 20th;century it had reached a general status as a party for the more wealthy classes in society. Many Republicans therefore gained financial success in the prosperous 1920s until the stock market crashed in 1929 initiating the era of the Great Depression. Now, many Americans blamed Republican President Herbert Hoover for the financial damages brought by the crisis. In 1932 the country therefore instead elected Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt to be president. The Democratic Party largely stayed in power until 1980, when Republican Ronald Reagan was elected as president. Reagans social conservative politics and emphasis on cutting taxes, preserving family values, and increasing military funding were important steps in defining the modern Republican Party platform. Democrats Adopted Socialist Ideas From EuropeThen in the early 1900s, the Democratic party adopted the expanding progressivism and socialism of European countries. In the 1930s, Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-prolonging reforms. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these massive expansions of federal power. So, the Democratic Party quickly became the party of big government. People sometimes argue that, the Democratic Party then became the party of big government and that the Republican party of big government became rhetorically committed to curbing federal power. How did this ideology switch happen? Read Also: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Democratic Losses In State Legislative SeatsDuring Obama’s tenure, Democrats lost members in 82 of the 99 state legislative chambers across the country. These losses were most visible in both chambers of the Arkansas and West Virginia state legislatures as well as the state senate chambers in Alabama and Oklahoma. The following table illustrates Democrats’ five largest losses in state legislative seats during President Obama’s two terms in office. Rankings were adjusted to account for varying sizes of legislative chambers.
Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/did-democrats-and-republicans-switch-parties/ Can The Republican Party Solve Its Science Denial Problem
Noam Chomsky: How Climate Change Became a ‘Liberal Hoax’
Evolution and climate science denial are predominant on the political right; there is no equivalent on the left Theres a widespread misconception about science denial that on issues like the safety vaccines and genetically modified foods , denial is found predominantly on the political left, mirroring the denial of evolution and climate science on the political right. This assumption has even been presented on The Daily Show, but its supported by precious little evidence. In fact, as Chris Mooney documented in great detail in 2014:
A Majority Of Republicans Say They Support Policies To Mitigate Climate ChangePercentage of Republicans in each congressional district who agree thatwe should regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant National average:57% A majority of Republicans in almost every congressional district support regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant, even when they dont believe those emissions are causing climate change. That may seem like a paradox, but theres a long history of support among people of all partisan backgrounds for regulating pollution basic things like clean water and clean air, Professor Egan said. To the extent global warming is framed that way, it raises support for policy interventions more than the abstract concept of climate change. Despite this majority support, Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, has worked to repeal Obama-era policies regulating power plant emissions. He has also raised questions over whether his agency should be regulating greenhouse gases at all. Bob Inglis, a former Republican congressman from South Carolina who is working to get others in his party to accept climate change, said that Republicans are often willing to embrace solutions, even if they say they dont believe in climate change. It doesnt help to point the finger at conservatives and ask, Do you believe? he said. By showing me a solution that fits with my values, Ive got a way to accept the existence of the problem. Republican support for various policy proposals, nationwide Support Attorneys General Step InRepublican attorneys general gathered at the Greenbrier resort in West Virginia in August 2015 for their annual summer retreat, with some special guests: four executives from Murray Energy, one of the nations largest coal mining companies. Murray was struggling to avoid bankruptcy a fate that had befallen several other coal mining companies already, given the slump in demand for their product and the rise of natural gas, solar and wind energy. The coal industry came to discuss a new part of the campaign to reverse the countrys course on climate change. Litigation was going to be needed, the industry executives and the Republican attorneys general agreed, to block the Obama administrations climate agenda at least until a new president could be elected. West Virginias attorney general, Patrick Morrisey, led the session, The Dangerous Consequences of the Clean Power Plan & Other E.P.A. Rules, which included, according to the agenda, Scott Pruitt, then the attorney general of Oklahoma; Ken Paxton, Texas attorney general; and Geoffrey Barnes, a corporate lawyer for Murray, which had donated $250,000 to the Republican attorneys general political group. That same day, Mr. Morrissey would step outside the hotel to announce that he and other attorneys general would sue in federal court to try to stop the Clean Power Plan, which he called the most far-reaching energy regulation in this nations history, drawn up by radical bureaucrats. Don’t Miss: Republican Presidential Polls State So What Does Trump Actually Believethat Mr Trump tends to conflate climate change with environmentalism more generally. “He doesn’t really understand what climate change is about,” says Professor Michael Gerrard, an environmental law professor at the University of Columbia. Meanwhile, Joseph Goffman, executive director of Harvard’s Environmental Law Programme, argues that Mr Trump “believes nothing on climate change – he’s a climate nihilist”. Mr Trump’s position is based on his need to appeal to “the part of the Republican establishment that rejects climate policy,” Mr Goffman, who previously worked as Democratic staff director on the Senate environmental committee, adds. Joseph Pinion, a Republican strategist who has called for more action on climate change, also argues that Mr Trump looks at the issue from a political, rather than a moral perspective. “He’s not going to win running on the environment,” Mr Pinion says. “In America, climate is not an issue, so the reason it is not an issue for President Trump is because he cares about winning. And the reason Democrats are OK with it not being a priority for them, is because they want to beat him.” “Ultimately it doesn’t matter what President Trump believes, what matters is what he’s doing – we need to recognise climate change is not a priority of his administration.” Trump Stokes The FiresWhen Donald J. Trump decided to run for president, he did not appear to have a clear understanding of the nations climate change policies. Nor, at the start of his campaign, did he appear to have any specific plan to prioritize a huge legal push to roll those policies back. Mr. Trump had, in 2012, , The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive. But he had also, in 2009, joined dozens of other business leaders to sign a full-page ad in the The New York Times urging Mr. Obama to push a global climate change pact being negotiated in Copenhagen, and to strengthen and pass United States legislation to tackle climate change. However, it did not go unnoticed that coal country was giving his presidential campaign a wildly enthusiastic embrace, as miners came out in full force for Mr. Trump, stoking his populist message. And the surest way for Mr. Trump to win cheers from coal crowds was to aim at an easy target: Mr. Obamas climate rules. Hillary Clinton did not help her cause when she said last spring that her climate policies would put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business. Don’t Miss: Number Of Trump Supporters Nearly Nine In 10 Foresee Global Warming Effects Eventually OccurringIn addition to the 59% of Americans who believe the effects of global warming have already begun, another 10% predict they will start happening within a few years or in their own lifetime. A further 19% foresee the effects affecting future generations, bringing the total who believe global warming will eventually affect humans to 88%. Most Americans across all demographic groups expect this, including large majorities of Republicans and independents , and nearly all Democrats . Still, there is variation across groups in the belief that the effects of global warming have already begun, a view that may be more relevant to the propensity for people to be politically active or factor it into their voting. Democrats , adults aged 18 to 34 , college graduates , non-White Americans and women are significantly more likely than their counterparts to say the effects have begun.
Americans Underestimate How Many Others In The Us Think Global Warming Is HappeningByMatthew Ballew, Abel Gustafson, Parrish Bergquist, Matthew Goldberg, Seth Rosenthal, John Kotcher, Edward Maibach and Anthony LeiserowitzPerceptions of what other people think and do can have a powerful influence on individuals own beliefs and actions. For example, research on household energy conservation demonstrates that individuals who consume a large amount of energy tend to decrease their energy use when they learn that their neighbors use less energy, and when they are told their peers approve of lower energy usage. However, people tend to misjudge what the beliefs and actions of others actually are a phenomenon known as pluralistic ignorance. In our , we found that the American public underestimates how many other Americans think global warming is happening . Americans on average estimate that only 54% of other Americans think global warming is happening, when in fact, 69% of Americans do. Some subgroups of Americans, including liberal Democrats and those with higher levels of education, more accurately estimate national public opinion about global warming . Conversely, other groups, such as conservative Republicans and people living in rural areas, are less accurate at estimating the opinions about global warming held by their fellow Americans. Methods CitationFunding SourcesThe research was funded by the 11th Hour Project, the Endeavor Foundation, the Energy Foundation, the TomKat Foundation, and the MacArthur Foundation. ProjectRead Also: Who Is Right Republicans Or Democrats Emotional And Psychological AspectsFlorida State Senator Tom Lee has described the emotional impact and reactions of individuals to climate change. Lee says, “If these predictions do bear out,;that it’s just economically daunting. I mean, you have to be the Grim Reaper of reality in a world that isn’t real fond of the Grim Reaper. That’s why I use the term emotionally shut down, because I think you lose people at hello a lot of times in the Republican conversation over this.” Emotional reactions to climate change may include guilt, fear, anger, and apathy. Psychology Today, in an article titled “The Existential Dread of Climate Change, has suggested that “despair about our changing climate may get in the way of fixing it.” The American Psychological Association has urged psychologists and other social scientists to work on psychological barriers to taking action on climate change. Most Americans Favor Expanding Renewable Energy Sources But Divides Remain Over Expanding Offshore Drilling Nuclear Power
Why People Don’t Believe In Climate Science
Most Americans favor expanding solar power or wind power , including strong majorities of both Republicans and Democrats. The public, however, is evenly divided over whether to expand nuclear power . Fewer than half of Americans support more offshore oil and gas drilling , hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas, known as âfrackingâ or coal mining . These findings are broadly in line with previous Center surveys, which found strong majorities in favor of increasing solar or wind power and more mixed views about expanding other energy sources. Support for more nuclear power plants has inched up 6 percentage points since 2016 . Support for coal mining has declined from 41% to 35% in the same period. Sizable majorities of both Republicans and Democrats â including those who lean to each party â favor more solar panel farms or wind turbine farms . More Republicans than Democrats support expanding nuclear power plants; support for nuclear power is stronger among conservative Republicans than among moderate or liberal Republicans . Conservative Republicans also stand out as more inclined to support expansion of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas as well as coal mining . By comparison, fewer than half of moderate or liberal Republicans favor expanding these energy sources . Also Check: Trump Interview 1998 People Magazine Climate Change Is RealThe climate is warming. On denialism and its implications WHEN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION last year disbanded a committee of scientists advising the Environmental Protection Agency, UCLAs J.R. DeShazo and other researchers from around the United States obtained outside funding and formed an independent entity to carry on the work. It is called the External Environmental Economics Advisory Committee. I and other environmental economists are evaluating each of the proposed EPA rules, but we are now doing that externally, with help from the Sloan Foundation, DeShazo, chair of the Department of Public Policy and director of the Luskin School for Innovation, said in an interview. Providing expert advice from outside a government agency, he said, could become a common approach. It is one example of how weve responded to political changes and efforts to limit the use of science in policymaking. Another response has been to pay more attention to how people accept and act on information, rather than on merely disseminating the information itself. Thats a specialty of another UCLA researcher, Aaron Panofsky, and others who see increasing evidence that a just the facts approach is not enough. Obama The Antichrist Global Warming A Myth Lizard People Controlling The World Conspiracy Theory Research Reveals Bizarre Beliefs Prevalent In Usclimate-change.jpgOne in five Republican voters believes Barack Obama is the antichrist and nearly a third of all Americans think a secret power elite controls the world, according to new research on conspiracy theories. A national poll conducted by the Public Policy Polling organisation found that 37 per cent of Americans also think global warming is a hoax, while 11 per cent of the population think the US government allowed the September 11 terrorist attacks to take place. The surprising results form part of the PPPs in-depth study of how political affiliation can dictate the likelihood of an individual believing in various conspiracy theories. The research found 34 per cent of Republicans polled believe a New World Order controls the world, compared with 35 per cent of independent voters and just 15 per cent of Democrats. While a total of 44 per cent of Americans think the Bush administration deliberately misled the public over weapons of mass destruction in an effort to start the Iraq war, that breaks down to 72 per cent of Democrats and just 27 per cent of Republicans. Other conspiracy theory beliefs have similar political overtones. Only 23 per cent of Democrats think global warming is a hoax, but over half of Republican voters think climate change is an elaborate myth. Meanwhile 33 per cent of Republicans think Saddam Hussein was in some way connected to the September 11 attacks, while 78 per cent of Democrats disagree with them. Also Check: How Many Republicans Are In Congress Only 27% Of Republicans Think Climate Change Is A ‘major Threat’ To The United StatesAccording to a new poll, less than a third of Republicans think that climate change is a “major threat to the well-being of the United States.” A survey conducted by the Pew Research Institute asked respondents about several “serious global threats,” including Russian influence, the Islamic State and North Korea’s nuclear program. Global climate change was far and away the most divisive issue: Only 27 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents agreed it was a threat, compared to 84 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. Overall, though, the issue ranked as the biggest crisis for most respondents, with 57 percent saying it put the U.S. at risk. That’s 2 percent less than were concerned with climate change in a 2017 Pew survey. That might not be surprising, given the debates about the Green New Deal in Congress. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who says he does believe in climate change, claimed the Green New Deal would ” off entire domestic industries down millions of jobsbasically the only sources of energy that working-class and middle-class families can actually afford.” Gov. Jay Inslee of Washington State, currently a Democratic candidate for president, has made the environment a central part of his campaign, with a “community climate justice” plan for America to transition to clean economy. None Of It Is In Good FaithHaving just made that basic argument for the 12 billionth time in my career, let me follow up by pointing out that making that argument is almost certainly futile. There is no interlocutor on the other side interested in arguments of facts. Theres no one to talk to. To see the true nature of right-wing climate denialism, its better to look past people like Rubio, who have trained their whole lives to pass as moderate on Sunday talk shows. Instead, the real truth of right-wing tribalism works on climate change is embodied by none other than President Donald Trump. Consider Trumps responses to the questioning of Lesley Stahl of 60 Minutes on the subject of climate change. Historians will marvel over this document:
Theres no argument here. Trump does not make arguments. There are just … phrases, unconnected to the phrases that precede and follow them. Its just bits of rhetoric Trump has heard his impression of what his people say about these things jumbled up in his brain. She protests: But thats denying it. She asks, What about all the scientists? Scientists also have a political agenda, he says. That sounds like hes calling it a hoax! Read Also: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Conservatives Have Been Gaslighting The Nation About Climate Change For YearsThat is obviously true when it comes to Trump, because he scarcely tries, indeed doesnt know how, to pretend otherwise. But its just as true of the entire conservative movement, for decades now. All the denialist talking points nefarious scientists, sunspots, natural cycles have their true believers in the base, among the chumps who drink the Kool-Aid and fill up the comment sections. But the motive force is not any assessment of science. Its the tight alliance between the cultural politics of white resentment and the power of fossil fuel and related industries. To acknowledge anthropogenic climate change is to empower liberals, open the door to additional taxes and regulations, and threaten the power of the fossil fuel industry. The Republican Party as currently constituted will simply never do those things. Ever. The arguments are secondary. Its difficult for people who care about climate change to accept this. It implies that all those hours spent earnestly arguing about climate science have been, to a first approximation, wasted. And its been a lot of hours thousands and thousands of hours, spent by people of good faith in hopes that evidence and reason can change minds. They are gaslighting, not persuading, and it will end when they are beaten and removed from office, not when climate scientists find just the right argument. Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/why-do-republicans-think-global-warming-is-a-hoax/ Polling Data Shows Republican Party Affiliation Is Down As Independents Leaning Toward The Democratic Party Surge
Registered voters for 2020 election
Democrats have a nine-percentage-point affiliation advantage over Republicans at the moment.
The GOP is losing its grip, according to the latest Gallup poll.; The number of Americans identifying as Republicans or as independents who lean toward the GOP dropped to 40% in the first quarter of 2021, compared with the number of Democrats or independents leaning toward the Democratic party hitting 49%. And that nine-percentage-point lead is the greatest Democratic advantage that Gallup has measured since the fourth quarter of 2012, when former President Barack Obama was re-elected.; Gallup routinely measures U.S. adults party identification and the political leanings of independents. The latest poll surveyed a random sample of 3,960 U.S. adults by phone between January and March of 2021. And while Democratic Party affiliation actually dropped by one point from the fourth quarter of 2020, to 30% where it has hovered for most of the past eight years the number of Americans identifying as independent rose to 44% from 38% last quarter. And this growing number of independents came at the expense of the Republican party, as 19% of independents said they lean Democrat, compared with 15% leaning Republican. Most of the remaining 11% of independents didnt swing either way.; And several events have happened during those three months that could position the Democratic Party more favorably in voters eyes, the Gallup report noted.; Read more: Opinion: Registered Democratic Voters Outnumber Republicans By Nearly 90k In NevadaThe Nevada secretary of states office on Friday reported there are 1,464,819 active registered voters statewide who are eligible to participate in the Nov. 8 general election. CARSON CITY The Nevada secretary of states office on Friday reported there are 1,464,819 active registered voters statewide who are eligible to participate in the Nov. 8 general election. There are 577,679 Democrats, 488,861 Republicans and 304,528 nonpartisans. The rest are minor- party registered voters. Democrats represent 39.4 percent of the total active registered voters, Republicans 33.4 percent and nonpartisans 20.8 percent. The numbers were released one day before early voting for the general election begins in Nevada. The total number of active registered voters is up by 251,626, an increase of 21 percent, compared to the 2014 general election close-of-registration figures. In the last presidential election in 2012, there were 1,257,621 active registered voters, with 526,986 Democrats and 436,799 Republicans. President Barack Obama won Nevada in 2012. Active Democratic voters in 2012 were 41.9 percent compared to 39.4 percent this year; Republicans accounted for 34.7 percent in 2012 and 33.4 percent in 2016. The biggest gain over the four years was in nonpartisan voters, from 17.4 percent in 2012 to 20.8 percent this year. Democrats have voter registration edges in three of Nevadas four congressional districts, Key Point From This ArticleAltogether, there are 31 states with party registration; in the others, such as Virginia, voters register without reference to party. In 19 states and the District, there are more registered Democrats than Republicans. In 12 states, there are more registered Republicans than Democrats. In aggregate, 40% of all voters in party registration states are Democrats, 29% are Republicans, and 28% are independents. Nationally, the Democratic advantage in the party registration states approaches 12 million. You May Like: Did Trump Call Republicans Stupid In 1998 Y Affiliation By StateParty affiliation by state Switch to:State by political party% of adults who identify as
This Marks The First Time Since Party Registration Began Republicans Are Also More Than Three Points Off Where They Were Four Years Earlier In 2004 When 3279 Percent Of Voters Were Republican AndPhoenix there are more registered democrats than republicans in arizonas congressional district 1, according to voting registration data recently analyzed by dataorbital. For decades, the word conservative have been synonymous with orange county. 39.66 percent of voters are registered with that party. There are now more registered independents than republicans, marking a first for the u.s. Ballot harvesting, a surge of illegal aliens from the southern border and middle eastern refugees resettled in orange county by obama has shifted the. Immigration policy is about a lot more than just border enforcement or ice raids. Since 2012, more voters have chosen not to register for either. Republicans and democrats are the dominant political parties in the united states of america. But today, a survey by ballot access shows there are more registered independents than republicans, perhaps a sign that political parties. According to the register, there are now 547,458 registered democrats versus 547,369 registered republicans. It is not a straightforward question. The county has had experienced shocking losses during the 2018 midterms where democrats controlled. Suppose there are 1000 white americans in total. Or was it just low turnout that allowed marijuana to get legalized there? But that doesnt mean everyone votes for their party. There are now more registered independents than republicans, marking a first for the u.s.
You May Like: Did Trump Say Republicans Are The Dumbest Are You Surrounded By Democrats Or Republicans How Jersey Breaks Red And Blue In All 21 CountiesHere is a county-by-county breakdown of which political party rules in each of New Jerseys 21 counties and how much each party gained since this time last year. New Jersey is a Democratic-leaning state, and its getting bluer by the month. Democrats have registered voters at a faster pace than Republicans in the Garden State. But the GOP still maintains pockets of control in some counties. Republicans are outnumbered by registered Democrats by nearly 1 million people , according to the latest statistics from the states Division of Elections. As of the end of September, New Jersey had 2,307,937 registered Democrats and 1,331,102 Republicans. Over the past year, Democrats added more than double the number of registered voters compared to the GOP , according to the data. However, registered Republicans outnumber Democrats in six of the states 21 counties, and there are a few other counties that are pretty evenly split. Also, Republicans out registered the number of new Democrats in six counties from this time last year, including in three counties where the number of Ds outweigh the Rs. The largest number of New Jersey voters 2,378,040 to be exact have not formally claimed any party affiliation. Twelve years ago, Democrats had a 290,000 vote plurality over registered Republicans statewide, said Ben Dworkin, director of Rowan Universitys Institute for Public Policy and Citizenship. In The 2012 Election Cycle More People Registered As Independent Voters Then As RepublicansRegistered democrats have a 10,133,829 ballot request lead over registered republicans. But its also a sign of how centuries. There are now more registered independents than republicans, marking a first for the u.s. In the 2012 election cycle, more people registered as independent voters then as republicans. How many states are democrat and how many are republican? Does that mean the person has signed something or theyre a member of do not report comments because they disagree with your point of view. To be clear, there are still more registered democrats than republicans in all three of these states. Get more help from chegg. Weve heard it over and over: Republicans who worked with democrats were traitors in the war for seats in congress. Neither party pursued civil rights. How many republicans switch to democrat as compared to democrats switching to republican, in public and in office. Democratic supporters accounted for 35% of the electorate. Recommended Reading: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans House Impeaches Trump A 2nd Time Citing Insurrection At Us CapitolThis vote could expose some of them to potential primary challenges from the right as well as possible safety threats, but for all of them Trump had simply gone too far. Multiple House Republicans said threats toward them and their families were factors weighing on their decisions on whether to impeach this president. Ten out of 211 Republicans in the House is hardly an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote, and clearly, most Republicans sympathies still lie with Trump and his ardent base of followers. But the 10 represent something significant the most members of a presidents party to vote for his impeachment in U.S. history. Who Are North Carolinas 7 Million Registered Voters
In Battleground States, Newly Registered Democrats Are Outnumbering Newly Registered Republicans
By Rebecca Tippett on 8.13.20 in Elections & Voting, NC in Focus This is the first in a three-part series on North Carolinas voters. Today, we take a look at North Carolinas 7 million registered voters. In the coming days, we will take a look at North Carolinas registered Republicans and Democrats, respectively. As of July 25th, 2020, North Carolina had about 7.8 million voting-eligible adults and 7 million registered voters. Their partisan affiliation was roughly split between three groups: Democrat, unaffiliated, and Republican, with a slight lead to Democrats. Specifically:
Other party registrations included Libertarian , Constitution Party , and Green Party . Who are these voters? And how do demographic characteristics vary among the largest affiliation groups ? Recommended Reading: Did Trump Say He Loves The Poorly Educated However The Majority Of Monmouth County Voters Chose To Register As Independent/unaffiliatedPostedFri, Jul9, 2021 at 1:28 pm ET|UpdatedFri, Jul9, 2021 at 2:37 pm ETMONMOUTH COUNTY, NJ For the first time in several years, there are now more registered Republican voters in Monmouth County than registered Democrats. The is according to the most recent voter registrant information provided by the New Jersey Division of Elections: As of July 1, there are 491,689 total registered voters in Monmouth County: Our Ruling: Partly FalseThe claim in the post is rated PARTLY FALSE. The tweet that appears in viral Facebook posts cites correct vote totals for Trump and Biden . But it falsely reports the number of registered voters. More than 159 million registered voters cast ballots in the general election, out of 239 million eligible voters. So it is completely possible that Trump and Biden would post that many total votes. You May Like: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans An Updating Tally Of How Often Every Member Of The House And The Senate Votes With Or Against The PresidentTrump margin: Trumps share of the vote in the 2016 election minus Clintons Trump score: How often a member votes in line with Trumps position Trump plus-minus: Difference between a members actual and predicted Trump-support scores
A Trump score is not calculated for members who have not voted. How this works » * No longer in Congress. Trump margin: Trumps share of the vote in the 2016 election minus Clintons Trump score: How often a member votes in line with Trumps position Trump plus-minus: Difference between a members actual and predicted Trump-support scores
New York City Voters Shifted From Republican Or Independent To Democratic Party Ahead Of PrimaryVoters The Democratic Party in New York has consistently grown its voter base over the years and has also drawn previously party-unaffiliated and Republican voters to its ranks. In the last year alone, more than 88,000 voters who either had no party registration or were registered with the Republican Party switched their affiliation to the Democrats, potentially creating a new bloc of voters that candidates may seek to woo in races such as the crowded and competitive primary contest to replace term-limited Mayor Bill de Blasio. According to data from the state voter file analyzed by Prime New York, a political consulting firm, 67,965 unaffiliated voters and 20,528 Republicans joined the Democratic Party, for a total of 88,493 new Democrats. In that same period, 20,136 Democrats switched over to the Republican Party. Just 209 voters from the Republican and Democratic Parties gave up their party affiliation and became so-called blank or independent voters. New York has a closed primary system, where only those with a party affiliation can vote in party primary elections. With 3.7 million registered Democrats in the city as of February 21, compared to just over 566,000 Republicans and about 1.08 million independents, the Democratic primaries all but decide the winner of the general election as well, at least for almost all citywide, boroughwide, and district-specific seats. Read Also: How Many Democrats Support Impeachment California Voter And Party ProfilesNOTES: Likely voters are registered voters meeting criteria on interest in politics, attention to issues, voting behavior, and intention to vote. For a full description of these criteria and regional definitions, visit www.ppic.org/wp-content/uploads/SurveyMethodology.pdf. For race and ethnicity, results are presented for Latinos, non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic Asian Americans, non-Hispanic African Americans, and non-Hispanic other race and multiracial adults. Sources: Seven PPIC Statewide Surveys from September 2019 to July 2020, including 11,725 adults and 7,243 likely voters. California Secretary of State, Report of Registration, August 2020. US Census Bureau, 20142018 American Community Survey. Related Content More Nevadans Registered As Republicans Than Democrats Last Month Election Officials SayLAS VEGAS Election officials say more Nevadans registered as Republicans last month than Democrats. Nevada Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske reported that the GOP gained 6,580 active registered voters in July. The Democratic Party added 5,718 active registered voters voters. Democrats still hold a statewide voter registration advantage over Republicans in Nevada, comprising 38% of all active registered voters. Republicans make up 33%. Unaffiliated voters are 23%. Overall, there are more than 1.6 million active registered voters in Nevada. Inactive registered voters are voters who generally do not have a current address on file with election officials. They are still eligible to cast ballots. Don’t Miss: Are There More Democrats Or Republicans In The Senate Democrats May Have Control At The Federal Level But Republicans Are Pushing Back Through States30 state legislatures are now controlled by Republicans, while only 18 are controlled by Democrats.Though the hotly anticipated Blue Wave did not sweep over the country as thoroughly as some analysts had predicted in the weeks and months leading up to the American election on November 3, 2020, theres no denying that Democrats notched major victories in both the Senate and the White House, despite losing several seats in the House of Representatives. But that victory is beginning to be undercut by the majority of state legislatures, which are Republican-controlled, as they begin to enact stricter voting laws, pass state sovereignty bills and push through highly conservative legislation to push back against Democratic ideologies in Washington. Registration Surges Follow The Campaign Calendar
Republicans Gain Statewide And Locally In Voter Registration
The election calendar also influences party registration trends, as key dates and campaign events drive interest in participation. For instance, a presidential primary or the registration deadline ahead of the general election can spark a flood of registrations. But sometimes this can create a disproportionate number of registrations from one party. Consider the 2020 presidential primary. Democrats had a competitive race, which drove interest in voting in 2019 and early in 2020 among Democrats and voters who wanted to have a say in the partys nomination contest. Meanwhile, Trump was practically unopposed in the GOP nomination contest, so there wasnt the same motivation among Republican-leaning voters to register ahead of the primaries in the spring until we got closer to the general election. Don’t Miss: Who Is Right Republicans Or Democrats Gop Registration Drop After Capitol Attack Is Part Of Larger TrendWASHINGTON In the weeks since the January riot at the Capitol, there has been a raft of stories about voters across the country leaving the Republican Party. Some of the numbers are eye-catching and suggest that the GOP may be shrinking before our eyes, but a closer look at the numbers over time shows that a larger change has been working its way through the party for some time. In fact, when one takes into account shifts in the composition of the Democratic Party, the real story seems to be more about a deeper remaking of the nations two major political parties. To be sure, the headlines from the last few weeks have been striking, with multiple states reporting large declines in Republican voter registrations. In Pennsylvania, more than 12,000 Republicans dropped the âRâ from their registrations in January. In North Carolina, the figure was close to 8,000. In Arizona the figure was about 9,200 through late-January. And in one county in California, San Diego, more than 4,700 Republicans left the party last month. Those are sizable changes and they are much larger than the moves away from the Democrats in those places, but they come with some caveats. There are always some losses and gains in registrations for the Democrats and Republicans. Partisan identity can be fluid for a large chunk of the voters, and remember: just because a voter is registered with one party doesnt mean he or she always votes for its candidates. Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/how-many-voters-are-registered-republicans/ In 2009 Republicans Predicted That The Economic Stimulus Package Would Only Make The Recession Worse And Cause More Unemployment
Caller: Can Republican Party Ever Win Again?
The results show they couldn’t have been more wrong. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ended the recession after only a few months. Although 750,000 people were losing their jobs each month when Obama took office, after the Recovery Act was passed the rate of job loss immediately decreased each month and within a year the economy showed positive job growth. Considering the severity of the 2008 economic collapse and the total opposition by Republicans to do anything at all to stimulate the economy, it is remarkable that the US economy recovered as quickly as it did. Looking at the rate of job loss and job creation, its easy to see that the stimulus of 2009 was highly successful in stopping the job losses and turning the economy around. What Do Other Republican Politicians ThinkThe ones who want to stay in Trump’s good graces are welcoming the audit. “We want transparency and answers for the American people,” Congresswoman Elise Stefanik, who is poised to replace Cheney in the Republican leadership, said last week. “What are the Democrats so afraid of?” Given that polls show a majority of Republicans think Democrats stole the election, members of the party who are in favour of the audit are on solid political ground. Some Republicans, including in Arizona, may be having doubts, however. “It makes us look like idiots,” Phoenix-area state senator Paul Boyer told the New York Times. “Looking back, I didn’t think it would be this ridiculous.” Republicans Predicted That We Would Find Iraqs Weapons Of Mass Destruction Even Though Un Weapons Inspectors Said That Those Weapons Didn’t ExistThe Bush administration continued to insist that WMDs would be found, even when the CIA said some of the evidence was questionable. As we all know, the WMDs predicted by the Bush administration did not exist, and Saddam Hussein had not resumed his nuclear weapons program as they claimed. Ultimately, both President Bush and Vice President Cheney had to admit that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. You May Like: Republican Leaders Against Trump Most Republicans Said That President Obama Should Be Impeached Because Of The 2012 Attack On The Us Consulate In BenghaziTheir own investigations, however, proved them wrong. Every Congressional inquiry, including those by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee, concluded that the Obama administration did nothing wrong regarding Benghazi, that there was no stand down order given, and that neither the President nor anyone in his administration lied about it. Each and every Republican investigation has reached this same conclusion, but Republicans continue to exploit this tragedy for political gain. Republicans Set To Rebound Big In 2022 Midterms UnlessWe are just 600 short days away from the 2022 midterm elections, which means it is the perfect time to handicap the Republicans chances to win back the House, Senate and prepare a serious challenge to President Biden Patrick Joseph ToomeyBlack women look to build upon gains in coming electionsWatch live: GOP senators present new infrastructure proposalSasse rebuked by Nebraska Republican Party over impeachment voteMORE already have Democrats scrambling to flip those seats in much easier electoral terrain. As I noted in The Hill last month, Republicans are on the hook to defend 20 of their seats in 2022, while Team Blue has just 14 seats to hold, all in states won by Joe Biden in 2020. Since March is a perfect month for sports analogies, a good defense provides for a strong offense when the status quo is Democrats retaining control of the upper chamber. While there is clearly a power in incumbency, FiveThirtyEight suggests that senate vacancies are actually more of a mixed bag. In election cycles since 1974, the party with the most Senate retirements has actually;gained;seats just as often as it has lost them. For every year like 2008, when more Republicans than Democrats retired and Republicans lost seats accordingly, theres a year like 2012, when a whopping seven Democrats retired yet the party picked up two Senate seats. How these various Rs play out in the next few months will determine if the Rs are successful in 2022. Don’t Miss: Democrats Voted For Trump Republicans Have Long Promised That TrickleTrickle-down economics is the practice of giving more money to the very wealthy so they can reinvest it, causing a “trickle-down” effect that creates jobs and stimulates growth. According to this theory, any tax increase on the wealthy will hurt the economy and cause another recession. Again, this theory has been thoroughly disproven. The huge tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans enacted by George W. Bush did not result in job creation or a robust economy. In fact, our economy took the worst nosedive since the Great Depression. Conversely, the tax increases on the wealthiest 1% passed by Presidents Clinton and Obama were followed by strong job growth, shrinking budget deficits, and lower unemployment rates. During the eight years after President Clinton raised taxes on the top 1%, the poverty rate went down. After Bush enacted trickle-down economic policies, the poverty rate began rising again. The Future Could Actually Be Bright For RepublicansThe most common political narrative outside MAGA-land is that the Republican Party is screwed, and richly deserves the ignominious future it faces. Until recently the GOP was a reasonably normal and intermittently successful center-right political party, not wildly different from its counterparts in other countries with a two-party system, despite some racist and militarist habits that burst into view in times of stress. But then America elected a Black president, and Republicans went a little crazy, according to those outside their circles. First they abetted a destructively antediluvian Tea Party Movement and then lurched into the arms of an evil charlatan who somehow got elected president and spent four years trashing hallowed conservative principles and losing both Congress and the White House before his disgraceful and violence-inflected departure. Worse yet, in the face of huge demographic challenges that beg for a new approach, the Republican Party has now lashed itself to a Trumpian mast going forward, following the most consistently unpopular president in American history in his bizarre crusade to deny he has ever lost anything. Meanwhile a shockingly united Democratic Party is whipping a few decades worth of liberal legislation through Congress as Republicans whine about cancel culture and try to sell the idea that Joe Biden is actually Che Guevara. Also Check: How Many States Are Controlled By Republicans Top Republicans Think Taking Back House And Senate Would Force Biden To CenterSenate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says if Republicans can win back control of Congress in the 2022 midterms, it would force President Joe Biden into a political corner. Speaking at an event in his home state of Kentucky, McConnell says Americans will have a big decision to make come midterms when control of the House and Senate will be up for grabs. Do they really want a moderate administration or not? If the House and Senate were to return to Republican hands that doesnt mean nothing will get done, McConnell said. What I want you to know is if I become majority leader again its not for stopping everything. Its for stopping the worst. Its for stopping things that fundamentally push the country into a direction that at least my party feels is not a good idea for the country. I could make sure Biden makes his promise to be a moderate, he added.
One of the things McConnell would be guaranteed to block from Biden would be a Supreme Court nomination, much like he did with former President Barack Obama and his last nominee, Merrick Garland.; The Democrats hold a slim lead of nine seats in the House with all 435 seats up for grabs. Republicans Said That If President Obama Was Reelected The Price Of Gasoline Would Rise To $545 A Gallon By January 2015
Trump Tells Republicans To Restrict Voting Rights Or They May Never Win Again
In fact, Senator Mike Lee of Utah said if Obama was reelected, the price of gas would reach $6.60 a gallon. Newt Gingrich, who was running for president in 2012, said Obamas energy policies, EPA regulations, and failure to approve the XL pipeline would result in $10.00 a gallon gasoline. Of course, these predictions were laughably wrong. Instead of $5.45 per gallon or $10.00 per gallon, the price of gas in January 2015, was $1.89, less than half of the all-time high of $4.15 a gallon under President Bush. You May Like: Republicans Wear Red Or Blue In 1993 When The Brady Law And The Assault Weapons Ban Were Passed Republicans Predicted Increasing Rates Of Crime And MurderThankfully, just the opposite happened. While the rate of violent crime had increased steadily from the 1970s into the 1990s, it suddenly began to drop after 1993 and continued to decline for more than ten years. What could have happened in 1993 to precipitate such a sudden and prolonged drop in crime? Thats the year Congress passed the Assault Weapons Ban and the Brady Law, which mandated background checks and a waiting period to buy a gun. Despite Republican predictions to the contrary, the Brady Law and the Assault Weapons Ban were followed by the most dramatic reduction in violent crime since the FBI started keeping statistics. The graphs below, based on the actual numbers from the FBI Uniform Crime Reports website, show how the rates of murder and violent crime in the US dropped suddenly after the 1993 Brady Law and Assault Weapons Ban were passed. These charts show the rate of murder and violent crime over 35 years based on numbers from the FBI Uniform Crime reports. How Far Can A Governor Take Emergency PowersRepublicans have criticized Newsoms use of emergency power during the coronavirus pandemic, saying hes exerted too much control without the usual checks and balances. As the pandemic sidelined normal work in the Legislature last year, Newsom issued as many executive orders in 2020 as his predecessor did in eight years.; Assemblymember Kevin Kiley a Rocklin Republican now running in the recall election sued Newsom to try to limit his emergency power, but ultimately lost in court. With that ruling that a governor has broad authority to change or rescind laws during an emergency, GOP candidates are now talking about how theyd use such power themselves. I would not use executive authority to create new laws and new policies, as this governor has, Kiley said in an interview with CalMatters. But I would use it to unwind things that never shouldve been there to begin with.; Kiley said he would end Newsoms pandemic emergency declaration, which would set the stage for reversing related public health rules, such as the requirement that children wear masks at school and that state employees and health care workers get vaccinated against COVID-19 . Other GOP candidates also pledge to reverse Newsoms mask and vax orders.;;; But the major Republican recall candidates are talking about using emergency powers for a lot more than the pandemic.; Kevin Faulconer, the Republican former mayor of San Diego, said he would to speed up prevention efforts to clear trees and brush.; Also Check: Donald Trump Campaign Pins What If 19 Alternate Histories Imagining A Very Different WorldAlternate history, long popular with fiction writers, has also been explored by historians and journalists. Here are some of their intriguing conclusions. 1. What if the South won the Civil War?Effect: America becomes one nation again in 1960. Explanation: In a 1960 article published in Look magazine, author and Civil War buff MacKinlay Kantor envisioned a history in which the Confederate forces won the Civil War in 1863, forcing the despised President Lincoln into exile. The Southern forces annex Washington, DC renaming it the District of Dixie. The USA moves its capital to Columbus, Ohio now called ;Columbia but can no longer afford to buy Alaska from the Russians. Texas, unhappy with the new arrangement, declares its independence in 1878. Under international pressure, the Southern states gradually abolish slavery. After fighting together in two world wars, the three nations are reunified in 1960 a century after South Carolinas secession had led to the Civil War in the first place. 2. What if Charles Lindbergh were elected President in 1940?Effect: America joins the Nazis. 3. What if Hitler successfully invaded Russia?Effect: The Fuhrer is revered in history as a great leader. 4. What if James Dean had survived his car crash?Effect: Robert Kennedy survives his assassination attempt. 5. What if President Kennedy had survived the assassination attempt?Effect: Republicans win every election for the next 30 years. Read Also: How Many Federal Judges Are Republicans Times Republicans Were WrongIt’s no secret that politicians tend to use exaggerated political rhetoric to get people to vote for them. In recent decades, Republicans have repeatedly made very ominous predictions about the horrors that will result from Democratic policies while painting a rosy picture of what will result from Republican policies. Now we have the luxury of looking back over the years to examine those predictions and policies. Below, you will find twenty-one examples of times Republicans were blatantly wrong. Read Also: Did Trump Call Republicans Stupid In 1998 Security Is This DangerousProbably not. According to documents released under court order, however, Cyber Ninjas prepared for sinister antifa agents to disrupt their efforts. For instance, they worried that a nearby chemical storage area could be sabotaged by leftists as part of an orchestrated attempt to breach the counting area. This hasn’t happened. Theres Even More Drama On The HorizonSparse polling of the recall election has shown a tightening contest on whether or not to remove Newsom. Elder also has a growing lead in the replacement race, though at least one poll has YouTube financial advisor and self-identified Democrat Kevin Paffrath actually topping the field. Team Newsom probably has mixed feelings about future polling, fearing both confirmation of the trend favoring Newsoms removal and less alarming numbers that might let Democrats relax back into complacency and indifference. The anti-recall effort has the resources to dominate paid advertising down the stretch , but it will need to settle on a consistent message and combat the growing word of mouth among Republicans that this is the moment theyve all been waiting for. Another variable involves the internal dynamics of the replacement race. With no general election on tap , Elders Republican rivals have no reason to hold back from savagely attacking him from one angle as Democrats attack him from the other. If late polls show a rival catching up with the talk-show host, it could have a hard-to-predict effect on turnout or might even vault Paffrath into the governorship should Newsom fall. Also Check: People Magazine 1998 Trump Quote What If Donald Trump Wins AgainDavid Frum: First-term Trump was lazy, gullible, ignorant, vain and crooked. Second-term Trump would be worse. By David FrumOctober 7, 2020 If Trump can limit his Electoral College losses in the fall election, he can still eke out a win What if he wins? The first thing to understand about that great what iffrom which so many other grim what ifs would followis what in the real world a so-called Donald Trump win would look like. If everyone eligible to vote is allowed to vote, if every vote legally cast is countedthen Trump is doomed. His only hope is to find some way to stop the voting, stop the count, and then rely on the weird mechanics of the U.S. Electoral College to save him, against the peoples vote. Barton Gellman reported in the Atlantic in September that the Trump team is working with officials in Republican-held states to set aside vote counts altogetherand instead authorize state legislatures to choose the states electors. If this scheme proves unfeasible, the Trump team has in mind a series of smaller finagles: arbitrarily stopping vote counts prematurely, rejectingor outright seizingmailed ballots, and many other forms of chicanery not seen in U.S. politics since the aftermath of the Civil War. Heres the core math to remember on the way to a Trump win.
LIVE: Watch the 2020 election results roll inThe November 2020 cover of Macleans And if so, what happens next? Which leads to the third what if: What Motivates The Republican Party
Trump admits ON AIR if voting was easier, Republicans would never win
The GOP seems wildly hypocritical and unprincipled, until you understand its guiding idea. In the fall of 2014, the Obama White House was busy trying to stop the spread of Ebola. The administration sent advisers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assist the afflicted countries health ministries, and it sent troops to West Africa to build emergency hospitals. It began screening people arriving in the United States from at-risk nations. It isolated and treated several American medical personnel who contracted the virus abroad and brought it back home. Toward the end of his new book, The Imposters, Steve Benen reminds us of what the Republican Party was doing while all of this was happening:
The Impostors:How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politicsby Steve BenenWilliam Morrow, 384 pp. Read Also: Donald Trump Republicans Are The Dumbest Via https://www.patriotsnet.com/what-if-republicans-win-everything-again/ United States House Of Representatives Elections
Graham: There’s nothing Democrats won’t do to win
2010 United States House of Representatives elections
The 2010 United States House of Representatives elections were held on November 2, 2010 as part of the 2010 midterm elections during President Barack Obama‘s first term in office. Voters of the 50 U.S. states chose 435 U.S. Representatives. Also, voters of the U.S. territories, commonwealths, and the District of Columbia chose their non-voting delegates.U.S. Senate elections and various state and local elections were held on the same date. Republicans regained control of the chamber they had lost in the 2006 midterm elections, picking up a net total of 63 seats and erasing the gains Democrats made in 2006 and 2008. Although the sitting U.S. President’s party usually loses seats in a midterm election, the 2010 election resulted in the highest losses by a party in a House midterm election since 1938, and the largest House swing since 1948. Republicans made their largest gain in House seats since 1938. Three Democratic committee chairman were defeated, Transportation chairman Jim Oberstar of Minnesota, Armed Forces chairman Ike Skelton of Missouri, and most notably Budget chairman John Spratt of South Carolina. Democrats made three pick-ups, winning an open seat in Delaware and defeating Republican incumbents in Hawaii and Louisiana. What Did The Democrats WinJoe Biden; illustration by Hope Gangloff Joe Biden; illustration by Hope Gangloff Submit a letter: Email us For now, democracy is hanging on. Ive been writing presidential election postmortems every four years since 1992, and I never imagined Id open one with that sentence. But despite Joe Bidens impressive and necessary win, this is the lesson of the 2020 election: our democracy remains intact, at least for today. We learned emphatically this year that the political chasm that opened in this country in the 1990s is wide and deep andfor the foreseeable future, and in spite of the president-elects rhetoriclikely to grow wider and deeper, threatening the idea that we can long continue as one nation. This was not a given going into the election. In the weeks before November 3, when we believed those sunny polls, Democrats anxiously whispered the word landslide. I was hearing projections from peopleknowledgeable people with experience on presidential campaignsthat Biden might top 350 even 400 electoral votes, which surely would have meant, in turn, as many as fifty-three or fifty-four Democrats in the next Senate, and ten or fifteen new Democrats in the next House. This creation of an alternate reality has been most chillingly evident in the Republican discussion of the Covid-19 pandemic. During the party convention in August, White House economic adviser Lawrence Kudlow spoke of the virus in the past tense. It was awful, he said:
|
AuthorPatriots.net is a one-stop resource for all questions, news and updates from republican party. Archives
January 2023
Categories |